81.
|
ProtoSociology:
Volume >
5
Stefan Beck
Vernunftanspruch und Erwartungsdruck
|
|
|
82.
|
ProtoSociology:
Volume >
5
Kirsten Adamzik
Dialoganalyse III. Referate der 3. Arbeitstagung
|
|
|
83.
|
ProtoSociology:
Volume >
5
Josef Wieland
Geschichte des ökonomischen Denkens
|
|
|
84.
|
ProtoSociology:
Volume >
5
Rupert Scholz
Die politische Union:
Realisierungschancen von Bundesstaat und Staatenbund
|
|
|
85.
|
ProtoSociology:
Volume >
5
Werner Becker
Ruinieren die Parteien den Staat?
|
|
|
86.
|
ProtoSociology:
Volume >
5
Autoren
|
|
|
87.
|
ProtoSociology:
Volume >
5
Impressum
|
|
|
88.
|
ProtoSociology:
Volume >
6
Axel Wüstehube
The Nature of Rationality
|
|
|
89.
|
ProtoSociology:
Volume >
6
Wulf Kellerwessel
Gewißheit als Norm. Wittgensteins erkenntnistheoretische Untersuchung in "Über Gewißheit"
|
|
|
90.
|
ProtoSociology:
Volume >
6
Uwe Wirth
Philosophische Aufsätze
|
|
|
91.
|
ProtoSociology:
Volume >
6
Georg Meggle
Das Universalisierungsproblem in der Moralphilosophie
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
Moral judgements have to be universalizable. There are many problems with this thesis (U). The problems to be dealt with here, are: (i) What is the connection between U and justifiablility? (ii) Is U a logical thesis? (iii) Is U analytically true? (iv) Is U adaquate? (v) Is utilitarianism a logical consequence of U?
|
|
|
92.
|
ProtoSociology:
Volume >
6
Erwin Rogler
Ist Carnaps Philosophie reflexionslos?
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
According to some critics Carnap's philosophy is "reflectioness", i.e. without epistemic content. In contrast to this assertion this essay will show that in the writings of Carnap's semantical period, especially in "Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology", the fundamentals of an epistemology are developed. It may be called linguistic internalism. The exposition of frameworks are interpreted as an epistemological foundation of semantics. Several problems within this project are discussed, e.g. the determination of domains of frameworks, ontological existence sentences, the relation between theories and frameworks and limits of rationality.
|
|
|
93.
|
ProtoSociology:
Volume >
6
Julian Nida-Rümelin
Die Vielfalt guter Gründe und die Theorie praktischer Rationalität
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
There is a plurality of good reasons for action. An adequate theory of practical rationality has to be compatible with it even if it requires certain modifications of our everyday practices of reasoning. Usual theories of practical rationality do not pass this test. It is envisaged how to revise adequately our understanding of practical rationality.
|
|
|
94.
|
ProtoSociology:
Volume >
6
André Kieserling
Medien und Gesellschaft: Die Medienkonzepte von Talcott Parsons, Jürgen Habermas und Niklas Luhmann
|
|
|
95.
|
ProtoSociology:
Volume >
6
Stefan Gosepath
Eine einheitliche Konzeption von Rationalität
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
This article argues for the thesis that there is only one basic form of rationality, which is applied in different areas. First of all, there is one meaning of the term "rational" which applies to all situations in which the term is used: "justified." If "rational" means simply "justified", then rationality can be broken down into as many types as there are kinds of justification. Two distinctions between kinds of justification seem particularly plausible: 1. relative vs. absolute justifications and 2. theoretical justifications of opinions vs. practical justifications of actions. Taken together, these two distinctions yield a division into four types of rationality. I maintain, however, that these two distinctions collapse upon more careful examination. In this article I will simply assume that no form of ultimate justification is convincing; thus, the first distinction does not apply. Against the second distinction I try to argue in this paper that theoretical rationality represents a form of practical rationality. The idea of an optimal choice of aims, actions, and opinions, which nonetheless differs from the orthodox model of practical rationality, thus proves to be the comprehensive central ingredient of the concept of rationality.
|
|
|
96.
|
ProtoSociology:
Volume >
6
Dieter Mans
Argumentation im Kontext
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
Some principles of logic-oriented theories of argumentation are discussed. A sharp distinction is drawn between arguments in formal contexts and arguments in non formal contexts. It is argued, that the analysis of colloquial arguments cannot be based on the logic-oriented theories of argumentation. The outline of a more realistic theory of argumentation is given, by using defeasable inferences as a starting point. The model is applied to some everyday arguments.
|
|
|
97.
|
ProtoSociology:
Volume >
6
Gerald L. Eberlein
Logik der Sozialwissenschaften:
150 Jahre nach J. St. Mills System of Logic
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
J. St. Mill's System of Logic (1843) is reexamined from the perspective of present-day analytical philosophy of the social sciences. His naturalistic epistemology, "state", "general/universal laws", "social statics/dynamics" are discussed, as well as his four methods. His nomological-behavioral position is analysed, along with his theoretical approach.
|
|
|
98.
|
ProtoSociology:
Volume >
6
Anna Riek
Political Liberalism
|
|
|
99.
|
ProtoSociology:
Volume >
6
Daniel Schoch
Die Wahrheit über den Lügner
|
|
|
100.
|
ProtoSociology:
Volume >
6
Ulfrid Neumann
Begriff und Geltung des Rechts
|
|
|