Displaying: 61-80 of 189 documents

0.081 sec

61. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry: Volume > 4 > Issue: 8
Yubraj Aryal Aesthetics of the Affects
62. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry: Volume > 4 > Issue: 8
Kathleen Haney Empathy and Otherness
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This reflection on the phenomenological analysis of empathy according to Edmund Husserl and Edith Stein suggests a basic structure for getting to know and retain other consciousness within a single unitary sphere of consciousness. Empathy provides the access to an other that does not absorb the other’s stream of consciousness. Rather, empathy is the possibility for the intersubjective intention of a shared world of space and time. Unless the I inculcates other consciousness within itself, the I cannot recognize itself as one among others.
63. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry: Volume > 4 > Issue: 8
William L. McBride, Yubraj Aryal Global Philosophy: Some Current Issues
64. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry: Volume > 4 > Issue: 8
Contributors
65. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry: Volume > 4 > Issue: 8
Bed P. Paudyal The High/Low Problematic in the Transnational Context
66. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry: Volume > 4 > Issue: 8
Mindy Tan The Biography of a Philosopher
67. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry: Volume > 4 > Issue: 9
Zijiang Ding Transformation of the Self in the Thought of Friedrich Schleiermacher
68. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry: Volume > 4 > Issue: 9
Amrita Ghosh America’s Asia: Racial Form and American Literature, 1893-1945
69. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry: Volume > 4 > Issue: 9
Susan Stewart Poetry and the Senses
70. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry: Volume > 4 > Issue: 9
Yubraj Aryal Are the Humanities Inconsequent?: Interpreting Marx’s Riddle of the Dog
71. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry: Volume > 4 > Issue: 9
Daniel W. Smith Deleuze’s Concept of the Virtual and the Critique of the Possible
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This paper sketches out what I take to be the component elements of Deleuze’s concept of the virtual. Deleuze develops this concept in his 1968 Difference and Repetition, in which he offers a critique, following Bergson, of the concept of the possible. The virtual-actual couple is thus meant to replace the possible-real opposition, which is incapable of accounting for difference, or the production of new. In this way, I how that Deleuze develops the concept of the virtual in response to Salomon Maimon’s claim, against Kant, that transcendental philosophy must provide the conditions of real experience, and not merely the conditions of possible experience.
72. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry: Volume > 4 > Issue: 9
Tsenay Serequeberhan African Philosophy as the Practice of Resistance
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The basic concern of the paper is to state what the practice of African Philosophy is and should be in view of the contemporary dismal situation of postcolonial Africa. The attempt is to articulate a conception of African philosophy as a critical un-packing of the ideas and conceptions that legitimated European expansion and to this day–having been internalized by the Westernized African elite–sanction Western hegemony. And so, along with the critique of Eurocentrism the paper explores what it means to “return to the source” and to reclaim our “generic human identity.” The aim, in all of this, is to articulate a conception of African philosophy as a critical and combative hermeneutics of the contemporary African situation.
73. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry: Volume > 4 > Issue: 9
Amrita Ghosh Carlyle, Mill, Bodington and the Case of 19th Century Imperialized Science
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The latter half of nineteenth-century England was rife with the evolution question. As English imperialism also reached its pinnacle during this time, racial gradations and superiority of the white race in the newly formed human chain loomed large culturally. In 1849, Thomas Carlyle anonymously published his anti-emancipationist perspective in “The Occasional Discourse on the Negro Question,” followed by John Stuart Mill’s divergent response to him in 1850 titled, “The Negro Question.” In 1878, The Westminster Review also published a woman’s perspective, “The Importance of Race and Its Bearing on the Negro Question” by Alice Bodington, which resembled the Carlyle essay in various ways. Although Mill’s essay was a direct attack on Carlyle’s explosive article and is overtly against Carlyle and Bodington’s ideas, this paper argues that an imperialist agenda underlies Mill’s views and in fact poses the same theories of Carlyle and Bodington. The paper first proceeds to interrogate Mill’s hegemonic subtext through a comparison of these three essays by situating them within the scientific discourse of the era, arguing that science, especially phrenology and evolution theories, didn’t exist in a vacuum, but was used to perpetrate the normative racial ideologies of the period. The paper also uses Edward Said’s theory of ‘Othering the Orient’ in Culture and Imperialism to show that while Mill seemingly diverges from Carlyle’s stance, this ‘othering’ is in fact present in all three writers’ works.
74. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry: Volume > 4 > Issue: 9
Rethinking Postcolonial Studies in the Age of Transnationalism
75. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry: Volume > 4 > Issue: 9
Paolo Parrini Methodology and Truth: Analogies Between Hermeneutics and Post-Positivist Philosophy of Science
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
For a long time–--maybe starting from the well known 1929 meeting in Davos–--the philosophy of exact and natural sciences deriving from Neo-positivism and hermeneutics followed separate ways. Post-positivistic philosophy of science and epistemology, though, saw the emerging of theses showing the existence of some affinities between the empirical method and the hermeneutical method. The paper singles these affinities out and discusses their consequences from the point of view of the problems of objectivity and truth. In particular, it supports the ideas of objectivity as achievement and of truth as empty regulative ideal.
76. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry: Volume > 4 > Issue: 9
Contributors
77. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry: Volume > 4 > Issue: 9
Andrew Hadfield Some Current Issues in Contemporary Criticism of Renaissance Literature
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This essay provides an overview of some recent issues in criticism of early modern English literature. For some scholars the early modern period can only be understood if we accept its irreducible difference; for others, people have always been more or less the same and so reading the past involves knowledge but not a vast leap of faith. Often these differences result in scholars using exactly the same material to reach diametrically opposed conclusions, as examples drawn from the study of early sixteenth-century literature demonstrate. Debates about love and allegory also reveal significant differences between scholars who want to see erotic language in allegorical terms and those who point out that there is a danger is missing the literal reading. Debates about the nature of print and publishing, how writers perceived their careers, how texts should be edited and what methods are appropriate for the study of early modern literature are also discussed. The article does not attempt to resolve all these important debates but shows that differences often stem from diverse conceptions of what literature actually is and what it does, indicating that the importance of such arguments ranges beyond the immediate object of study.
78. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry: Volume > 5 > Issue: 11
Leonard Lawlor “There Will Never be Enough Done”: An Essay on the Problem of the Worst in Deleuze and Guattari
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The question confronting thought today is: what is a suicide bomber? But this question is a sign of a greater problem: the problem of the worst, which is apocalypse, complete suicide. Deleuze and Guattari and Derrida have given us the philosophical concepts to formulate this problem with more complexity and precision. Deleuze and Guattari have defined our current situation in terms of the post-fascist figure of the war machine, a figure that is worse, more terrifying, than fascism itself. Similarly, Derrida has defined our epoch in terms of a holocaust that is worse than any holocaust seen in the Bible. The problem of the worst then is so bad today that it requires that we make every effort to find a solution. The essay that follows constructs the beginnings of a solution to the problem of the worst. The solution will consist in a hyperbolic or even revolutionary gesture of inclusiveness that opens out onto an “elsewhere” that still needs a name. As we shall see however, no solution will ever be enough, no solution will ever be sufficient. There will never be enough done, said, or written in the name of what prevents the worst.
79. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry: Volume > 5 > Issue: 11
James Williams Against Oblivion and Simple Empiricism: Gilles Deleuze's 'Immanence: a life. . .'
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This article discusses Gilles Deleuze’s article ‘Immanence: a life. . .’ in relation to two problems. The first is the problem of empirical oblivion, or the way any record of an event involves a forgetting of aspects of that event which may later turn out to be of great significance. The second is the problem of latent significance, that is, of how events missed in the past remain latent and can be - perhaps ought to be–returned to in the future. The article argues that these problems are in fact linked. They explain in part the importance of Deleuze’s transcendental philosophy in ‘Immanence: a life. . . .’ The article concludes with a critical reading of Giorgio Agamben’s interpretation of Deleuze’s essay, in order to defend the position that Deleuze’s philosophy answers the joint problems of oblivion and latency by connecting actual and virtual events in novel acts that attempt to be worthy of that which must necessarily pass by creating new signs that reignite the past by transforming it.
80. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry: Volume > 5 > Issue: 11
Yubraj Aryal Importance of Sound in Poetry