Displaying: 61-80 of 87 documents

0.046 sec

61. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 4 > Issue: 4
INDEX
62. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 4 > Issue: 4
Eugene Hargrove Ecological Sabotage: Pranks or Terrorism?
63. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 40 > Issue: 4
Index for 2018
64. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 41 > Issue: 4
Index for 2019
65. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 10 > Issue: 2
The Shape of Things to Come
66. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 10 > Issue: 4
INDEX TO VOLUME 10
67. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 10 > Issue: 4
CUMULATIVE FIVE-YEAR INDEX
68. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 11 > Issue: 1
Beginning the Next Decade: Taking Stock
69. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 11 > Issue: 3
The Gospel of Chief Seattle is a Hoax
70. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 11 > Issue: 4
The Future is Now
71. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 11 > Issue: 4
INDEX TO VOLUME 11
72. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 12 > Issue: 4
INDEX TO VOLUME 12
73. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 13 > Issue: 4
INDEX
74. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 14 > Issue: 2
Changing Times
75. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 14 > Issue: 4
INDEX
76. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 15 > Issue: 4
FIFTEEN-YEAR CUMULATIVE INDEX (1979-1993)
77. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 15 > Issue: 4
After Fifteen Years
78. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 15 > Issue: 4
INDEX 1993
79. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 16 > Issue: 2
Overcoming Environmental Newspeak
80. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 16 > Issue: 4
Body and Environment
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
My thesis is the biconditional that it is morally wrong to pollute human bodies if and only if it is morally wrong to pollute the environment. The argument for each conditional is by analogy: pollution of one type is analogous to pollution of the other type in morally relevant respects. I argue that the truth of the biconditional makes it difficult to maintain that it is morally wrong to pollute human bodies without maintaining that it is morally wrong to pollute the environment and conversely.