61.
|
Studia Phaenomenologica:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: 1/2
Bruce Bégout
Percevoir et Juger:
Le rôle de la croyance originelle (urdoxa) dans la théorie du jugement de Husserl
|
|
|
62.
|
Studia Phaenomenologica:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: 1/2
Claudio Majolino
Le différend logique: jugement et énoncé:
Eléments pour une reconstruction du débat entre Husserl et Marty
|
|
|
63.
|
Studia Phaenomenologica:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: 1/2
Victor Popescu
Espace et mouvement chez Stumpf et Husserl:
Une Approche Méréologique
|
|
|
64.
|
Studia Phaenomenologica:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: 3/4
Pascal Dupond
Nature et Logos:
d’une pensée de la fondation (Fundierung) à une pensée de l’entrelacs (Ineinander)
|
|
|
65.
|
Studia Phaenomenologica:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: 3/4
Malika Temmar
Effets de présence et ostension:
Une approche discursive
|
|
|
66.
|
Studia Phaenomenologica:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: 3/4
Alain Beaulieu
La réforme du concept phénoménologique de «monde» par Gilles Deleuze
|
|
|
67.
|
Studia Phaenomenologica:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: 3/4
Éliane Escoubas
Merleau-Ponty et l’esthétique
|
|
|
68.
|
Studia Phaenomenologica:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: 3/4
Renaud Barbaras
Le problème du chiasme
|
|
|
69.
|
Studia Phaenomenologica:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: 3/4
Emmanuel de Saint Aubert
Le mystère de la chair:
Merleau-Ponty et Gabriel Marcel
|
|
|
70.
|
Studia Phaenomenologica:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: 3/4
Adina Bozga,
Ion Copoeru
Introduction
|
|
|
71.
|
Studia Phaenomenologica:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: 3/4
Etienne Bimbenet
«Voir c’est toujours voir plus qu’on ne voit»:
Merleau-Ponty et la texture onirique du sensible
|
|
|
72.
|
Studia Phaenomenologica:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: 3/4
Pierre Rodrigo
Ni le corps ni l’esprit:
La chair de Husserl à Merleau-Ponty
|
|
|
73.
|
Studia Phaenomenologica:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: Special
François Fédier
L’irréprochable
|
|
|
74.
|
Studia Phaenomenologica:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: Special
Françoise Dastur
La poésie comme origine (Hölderlin et Heidegger)
|
|
|
75.
|
Studia Phaenomenologica:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: Special
François Vezin
Art, mondialisation, primitivisme
|
|
|
76.
|
Studia Phaenomenologica:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: Special
Eliane Escoubas
Walter Biemel et les oeuvres de peinture:
la «révolution copernicienne» de Picasso
|
|
|
77.
|
Studia Phaenomenologica:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 1/2
Pascal Chabot
L’idéalité enchaînée:
Husserl et la question des « mondes possibles »
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
The aim of this paper is to show how the concept of “possible world”, that Husserl inherits from his study of logics, is capital for the understanding of his phenomenology. This concept is a fine tool that provides him a possibility to articulate the question of the physical and the cultural dimensions of some objects. A cultural object as a book or a painting has in fact two dimensions: a “material” one and a “spiritual” one. The author examines which are the relationships between those two dimensions. This question leads him to an interrogation on the genesis of the ideality of the cultural world. Is there not a contradiction between the ideality of the meaning and his historical genesis? In order to provide an answer to this question, the author suggests that one may use the notion of a “linked ideality”, i.e. ideal but linked up to the earth.
|
|
|
78.
|
Studia Phaenomenologica:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 1/2
Jean-Claude Gens
L’esthétique Brentanienne Comme Science Normative
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
According to Brentano, logic, ethics and aesthetics are practical normative sciences, and they correspond to the three classes of psychic phenomena. But if a judgment or a love may be correct or incorrect, it seems more difficult to speak of a correct representation as this class of phenomena ignores a polarity such as right / wrong or good / bad. Brentano speaks nevertheless from the aesthetical “value” of representations. Aesthetics could in this way be considered as part of a general theory of value; but compared to ethics the specificity of this science tends to vanish. Another way to consider the question is to remember that the distinction among the three classes of psychic phenomena is only formal. It means that one has to question more precisely the very nature of representation and especially its relation to feeling.
|
|
|
79.
|
Studia Phaenomenologica:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 1/2
Servanne Jollivet
Heidegger, lecteur d’Aristote:
Du mouvement à la mobilité dans l’herméneutique facticielle (1919-1924)
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
Bringing back reflection to the mobility of the existence, a systematic re-appropriation of the Aristotelian concept of movement underlines the Heideggerian re-foundation of philosophy. Hence deconstructed and elaborated through “mobility”, the notion of movement constitutes the foundation stone that allows to play Aristotle against Aristotle and to contribute, via his hermeneutical reinvestment, to the “destruction” of the substantialist tradition.
|
|
|
80.
|
Studia Phaenomenologica:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 3/4
Alexandru Dragomir,
Michelle Dobré
Dans la contrée du laid-dégoûtant
|
|
|