Displaying: 61-80 of 86 documents

0.125 sec

61. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 4 > Issue: 4
Eugene Hargrove Ecological Sabotage: Pranks or Terrorism?
62. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 40 > Issue: 4
Index for 2018
63. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 41 > Issue: 4
Index for 2019
64. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 10 > Issue: 2
The Shape of Things to Come
65. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 10 > Issue: 4
INDEX TO VOLUME 10
66. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 10 > Issue: 4
CUMULATIVE FIVE-YEAR INDEX
67. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 11 > Issue: 1
Beginning the Next Decade: Taking Stock
68. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 11 > Issue: 3
The Gospel of Chief Seattle is a Hoax
69. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 11 > Issue: 4
The Future is Now
70. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 11 > Issue: 4
INDEX TO VOLUME 11
71. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 12 > Issue: 4
INDEX TO VOLUME 12
72. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 13 > Issue: 4
INDEX
73. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 14 > Issue: 2
Changing Times
74. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 14 > Issue: 4
INDEX
75. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 15 > Issue: 4
FIFTEEN-YEAR CUMULATIVE INDEX (1979-1993)
76. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 15 > Issue: 4
After Fifteen Years
77. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 15 > Issue: 4
INDEX 1993
78. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 16 > Issue: 2
Overcoming Environmental Newspeak
79. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 16 > Issue: 4
Body and Environment
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
My thesis is the biconditional that it is morally wrong to pollute human bodies if and only if it is morally wrong to pollute the environment. The argument for each conditional is by analogy: pollution of one type is analogous to pollution of the other type in morally relevant respects. I argue that the truth of the biconditional makes it difficult to maintain that it is morally wrong to pollute human bodies without maintaining that it is morally wrong to pollute the environment and conversely.
80. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 16 > Issue: 4
INDEX