41.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 1
Tomáš Machula
Les quatre causes de l’être selon la philosophie premiére d’Aristote:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
|
|
|
42.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 1
David Peroutka OCD
K Novákově odpovědi:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
|
|
|
43.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 1
Stanislav Sousedík
Základní fenomény lidského bytí očima filosofie. Témata týkající se života každého člověka.:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
|
|
|
44.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 1
Paul E. Oppenheimer,
Edward N. Zalta
Reflections on the Logic of the Ontological Argument:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
The authors evaluate the soundness of the ontological argument they developed in their 1991 paper. They focus on Anselm’s first premise, which asserts that there is a conceivable thing than which nothing greater can be conceived. After casting doubt on the argument Anselm uses in support of this premise, the authors show that there is a formal reading on which it is true. Such a reading can be used in a sound reconstruction of the argument. After this reconstruction is developed in precise detail, the authors show that the conclusion, a reading of the claim “God exists”, does not quite achieve the end Anselm desired.
|
|
|
45.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 1
Lukáš Novák
Problém abstraktních pojmů:
Odpověď Davidu Peroutkovi
|
|
|
46.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 1
Stanislav Sousedík
Dilinganae Disputationes. Der Lehrinhalt der gedruckten Disputationen an der philosophischen Fakultät der Universität Dillingen.:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
|
|
|
47.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 1
Peter Hoenen SJ
Descartův Mechanicismus:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
|
|
|
48.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 1
Rastislav Nemec
The Eternity of God. Comparative Study of Bernard Lonergan SJ and Richard Swinburne.:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
|
|
|
49.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
5 >
Issue: 1
Stanislav Sousedík
Člověk a stát:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
|
|
|
50.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
5 >
Issue: 1
Prokop Sousedík
Co je podle Wittgensteina řeč?:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
The author shows that, after some considerations about the nature of speech, we can take two substantially different paths. Wittgenstein’s early philosophy is the paradigm of the first path, his later the paradigm of the second. According the author, the difference between these two conceptions is that in the late Wittgenstein, as opposed to his early conception, rejects the search for, and the clarification of, the essence of our language.
|
|
|
51.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
5 >
Issue: 1
Pavel Materna,
Josef Petrželka
Definition and Concept. Aristotelian Definition Vindicated:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
The modern (Russellian) theory of definition conceives definitions as abbreviations, so that the question of adequateness (let alone of truth-value) of definitions becomes meaningless. In this paper we show that beside Russellian conception of definitions understood as abbreviations, there is an Aristotelian conception, which exploits the notion of essence and that this conception can be rehabilitated from the standpoint of the modern logic (in particular by means of Pavel Tichý’s Transparent Intensional Logic). Also Carnap’s ‘explication’ indicates that what we feel to be a definition is frequently distinct from a Russellian definition.
|
|
|
52.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
5 >
Issue: 1
Lukáš Novák
Metafyzika jako věda. Ibn Síná a Ibn Rušd ve scholastické diskusi.:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
|
|
|
53.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
5 >
Issue: 1
Suárez’s Metaphysics. Disputationes Metaphysicae in their Historical and Systematical Context.:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
|
|
|
54.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
5 >
Issue: 1
Michal Chabada
700-lecie śmierci bł. Jana Dunsa Szkota. Międzynarodowe sympozjum jubileuszowe:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
|
|
|
55.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
5 >
Issue: 1
Lukáš Novák
Ján Duns Scotus. Vybrané kapitoly z jeho epistemológie a metafyziky.:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
|
|
|
56.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
5 >
Issue: 1
Stanislav Sousedík,
Karel Šprunk
G. Frege:
Dialog s Pünjerem Český překlad s kritickým výkladem
|
|
|
57.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
6 >
Issue: 1
Gottlob Frege
Funkcia a pojem:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
|
|
|
58.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
6 >
Issue: 1
Ulrich G. Leinsle
Philosophie der frühen Neuzeit in den böhmischen Ländern:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
|
|
|
59.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
6 >
Issue: 1
Peter Volek
Správa z medzinárodnej konferencie Dôvera v rozum:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
|
|
|
60.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
6 >
Issue: 1
Daniel Heider
The Nature of Suárez’s Metaphysics. Disputationes Metaphysicae and Their Main Systematic Strains:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
The paper presents seven basic features of Francisco Suárez’s metaphysics. They are as follows: “Univocalization” of the concept of being and transcendental properties, “reification” of the act-potency doctrine, “ontologization” of individuality, “conceptualization” of the Scotist perspective, “existential” character of the concept of being, “epistemologization” and “methodologization” of metaphysics. Whereas the first five are indicated as remaining in the preserve of the traditional scholastic philosophy, the last two are taken as portending the methodological priority of the subjective states of affairs of early modern “main-stream” philosophy.
|
|
|