Displaying: 41-60 of 183 documents

0.162 sec

41. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 3/4
Renaud Barbaras Le problème du chiasme
42. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 3/4
Emmanuel de Saint Aubert Le mystère de la chair: Merleau-Ponty et Gabriel Marcel
43. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 3/4
Adina Bozga, Ion Copoeru Introduction
44. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 3/4
Etienne Bimbenet «Voir c’est toujours voir plus qu’on ne voit»: Merleau-Ponty et la texture onirique du sensible
45. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 3/4
Pierre Rodrigo Ni le corps ni l’esprit: La chair de Husserl à Merleau-Ponty
46. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: Special
François Fédier L’irréprochable
47. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: Special
Françoise Dastur La poésie comme origine (Hölderlin et Heidegger)
48. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: Special
François Vezin Art, mondialisation, primitivisme
49. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: Special
Eliane Escoubas Walter Biemel et les oeuvres de peinture: la «révolution copernicienne» de Picasso
50. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 4 > Issue: 1/2
Pascal Chabot L’idéalité enchaînée: Husserl et la question des « mondes possibles »
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The aim of this paper is to show how the concept of “possible world”, that Husserl inherits from his study of logics, is capital for the understanding of his phenomenology. This concept is a fine tool that provides him a possibility to articulate the question of the physical and the cultural dimensions of some objects. A cultural object as a book or a painting has in fact two dimensions: a “material” one and a “spiritual” one. The author examines which are the relationships between those two dimensions. This question leads him to an interrogation on the genesis of the ideality of the cultural world. Is there not a contradiction between the ideality of the meaning and his historical genesis? In order to provide an answer to this question, the author suggests that one may use the notion of a “linked ideality”, i.e. ideal but linked up to the earth.
51. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 4 > Issue: 1/2
Jean-Claude Gens L’esthétique Brentanienne Comme Science Normative
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
According to Brentano, logic, ethics and aesthetics are practical normative sciences, and they correspond to the three classes of psychic phenomena. But if a judgment or a love may be correct or incorrect, it seems more difficult to speak of a correct representation as this class of phenomena ignores a polarity such as right / wrong or good / bad. Brentano speaks nevertheless from the aesthetical “value” of representations. Aesthetics could in this way be considered as part of a general theory of value; but compared to ethics the specificity of this science tends to vanish. Another way to consider the question is to remember that the distinction among the three classes of psychic phenomena is only formal. It means that one has to question more precisely the very nature of representation and especially its relation to feeling.
52. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 4 > Issue: 1/2
Servanne Jollivet Heidegger, lecteur d’Aristote: Du mouvement à la mobilité dans l’herméneutique facticielle (1919-1924)
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Bringing back reflection to the mobility of the existence, a systematic re-appropriation of the Aristotelian concept of movement underlines the Heideggerian re-foundation of philosophy. Hence deconstructed and elaborated through “mobility”, the notion of movement constitutes the foundation stone that allows to play Aristotle against Aristotle and to contribute, via his hermeneutical reinvestment, to the “destruction” of the substantialist tradition.
53. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 4 > Issue: 3/4
Alexandru Dragomir, Michelle Dobré Dans la contrée du laid-dégoûtant
54. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 4 > Issue: 3/4
Alexandru Dragomir, Michelle Dobré De l’unicité
55. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 4 > Issue: 3/4
Alexandru Dragomir, Michelle Dobré De quelques manières de se tromper soi-même
56. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 4 > Issue: 3/4
Alexandru Dragomir, Michelle Dobré Que Signifie «Distinguer»?
57. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 4 > Issue: 3/4
Alexandru Dragomir, Michelle Dobré Sur le non-sens du passé et de l’avenir
58. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 4 > Issue: 3/4
Virgil Ciomoş Théorie et Pratique de la Phénoménologie: Une Rencontre Manquée
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
In this article, the author recalls the circumstances when he first met Alexandru Dragomir, together with André Scrima and Mihai Şora, with the occasion of a conference on the phenomenology of time at the New Europe College in Bucharest. Then, the author talks about his philosophical relationship with Alexandru Dragomir during the following years, insisting upon the phenomenological debates they had and upon the specific manner of Dragomir’s thinking.
59. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 4 > Issue: 3/4
Alexandru Dragomir, Michelle Dobré L’attention et les cinq manières de quitter le présent
60. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 4 > Issue: 3/4
Alexandru Dragomir, Michelle Dobré Du bien et du mal