Displaying: 21-40 of 183 documents

0.257 sec

21. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 20
Reza Rokoee La Paideia phenomenologique entre Husserl et Fink
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The question of Paideia analysed in Jaeger’s pioneering study may be linked to Husserl’s question of the formation of the monadic self, intersubjectivity and the foundation of the community of human beings. Husserl’s phenomenological education manifests itself in the formation of an ego and a phenomenological community. In addition, Fink, having close intellectual links with Husserl, undertakes an in-depth analysis of the question of educa­tion as a sublime model of the Greek city. In this paper we propose a comparative analysis about Paideia between Husserl’s late writings since his Cartesian Meditations, and Fink’s relevant works.
22. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 20
Francesco Fronterotta Etre, presence et verite: Platon chez Heidegger (et a rebours)
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
In this article, I wish to present and discuss some Heideggerian theses concerning the notions of “being,” “presence” and “truth” in Plato’s dialogues, taking as a point of departure Heidegger’s course on Plato’s Sophist given in Marburg in 1924–1925. My aim is to show that the fundamental philosophical link that unites them makes it possible to better understand seemingly obscure aspects of the Platonic conception of being and knowledge as it is presented in particular in the concluding pages of Republic V (476e–479e), to which this article is therefore essentially devoted.
23. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 20
Filip Karfík Critique et appropriation: Les platonismes dans les ecrits de Jan Pato·ka de l’apres-guerre
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The paper deals with a series of writings on Plato and Platonism issued by Jan Patočka (1907–1977) in the immediate post-war period. In Eternity and Historicity (1947), he contrasts Platonism as metaphysics of being with Socratism as questioning the meaning of human existence, and criticizes modern forms of Platonism of ethical values interpreted as objectively valid norms. In lectures on Plato (1947–1948), he explains Plato’s theory of Forms in terms of Husserl’s theory of horizontal intentionality and Heidegger’s theory of ontological difference. Similarly, in Negative Platonism (1952) he interprets Plato’s theory of Forms in terms of a distinction he makes between between the eidetic contents (the intelligible Form) and the transcendental character (chōrismos) of the Platonic Idea. The latter is the necessary condition of the former but it does not constitute an intelligible object of its own. Patočka suggests retaining the Platonic notion of transcendence while dissociating it from the metaphysics of intelligible Forms. The paper puts these post-war writings on Plato and Platonism into the context of Patočka’s search for his own position as a phenomenologist.
24. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 21
Dorothée Legrand Ecouter parler le langage: Triplicité du témoignage
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
We explore the idea that a testimony is always constituted by at least three parts—the word of the witness, the listening of the one to whom it is addressed, and language as a symbolic register where speaking and listening are inscribed. Thus, the structure of testimony would not be captured only by the subjective formula “I was there”—a subject designates himself in reference to a past experience—, nor by the intersubjective formula “I am speaking to you”—a subject designates himself and his listener in the synchrony of the word addressing the other. What is also necessary to consider, in order to capture the structure of testimony, is that “there is language”—the testimony transcends diachronically the speaker and the hearer by inscribing them inseparably in the symbolic register that they share, namely language.
25. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 21
Yasuhiko Sugimura Orcid-ID Témoigner après la « fin de la philosophie »: L’herméneutique radicale du témoignage dans la philosophie française post-heideggérienne
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Witnessing after the “end of philosophy,” in the sense in which Heidegger mentions it in his famous lecture on “The end of philosophy and the task of thinking”—what does this mean for us and our world today? As a preparation for an answer to this question, the present study proposes to elaborate a radical hermeneutics of testimony, by invoking French philosophers who can be qualified as “post-Heideggerian”—Lévinas, Ricoeur, Derrida, among others—whose thoughts on testimony were developed through the essential critique on Heideggerian idea of attestation (Bezeugung) and the creative reactivation of the semantic resources historically preserved by terms such as “witness” and “testimony”.
26. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 21
Rodolphe Olcèse Excès du témoignage, déhiscence du témoin. Søren Kierkegaard, Emmanuel Lévinas, Jean-Louis Chrétien
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This text articulates the concept of subjective truth developed by Søren Kierkegaard in Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, in connection to a conception of testimony which both exceeds and reveals the possibilities of thinking and acting of the witness. This imbalance between the testimony and the witness finds an important extension in the distinction between the Saying and the Said made by Emmanuel Lévinas in Otherwise than Being, or Beyond Essence. This distinction opens up an understanding of thought as affectivity and allows witnessing to be viewed in the light of responsibility to the other. By being part of this philosophical heritage, Jean-Louis Chrétien shows how the testimony of the infinite is also phenomenalized in the experience of a chant that discovers its own modalities in this excess of beauty on the voice that tries to say it.
27. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 21
Francesca Peruzzotti Orcid-ID Entre parole et histoire: Le témoin dans la philosophie de Jean-Luc Marion
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Witnessing is an increasingly important theme in the work of Jean-Luc Marion. According to Marion, the witness can be considered an appropriate figure to define the first person, the “I,” without reducing it to subjectivism and without envisaging the intersubjective tie as binary (dual or dialogic), inasmuch as the testimony refers instead to a ternary relation. The present analysis investigates the difference Marion identifies between the religious witness and what seems to be, according to common sense, the regular witness. While in the latter case, the subject is completely foreign to the event to which s/he testifies, in the case of the religious witness, the commitment is total. We will tackle this difference by showing that the fact of testifying always implies a connection with effectivity, which reveals itself through the profound commitment characterizing the witness’s life, up to the point of death. This becomes obvious when considering the role played by the witness’s confessing speech, which establishes an unsurpassable ternary relationship between the witness, the object of the testimony, and the one to whom it is addressed, by deploying an absolute form of the social bond.
28. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 21
Jean-Philippe Pierron Pourquoi avons-nous besoin du témoignage ?: Penser le témoignage avec Paul Ricoeur
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This article proposes to analyze the relations between ethics and the poetics of testimony. It does so by testing Paul Ricoeur’s analyses of testimony with the literary work of the Belarusian Nobel Prize winner Svletana Alexievitch. After having shown why witnessing occupies a type of expressivity that is singular in contemporary times, and then having been surprised by the strong links that unite witnessing and the experience of evil, Alexievitch’s work is chosen to explain what the resource of the poetic could be, in the face of the question of evil. Ultimately, the consequences are drawn for the development of a practical wisdom in which testimony would be in a good place.
29. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 22
Rodolphe Olcèse Vertige du moindre geste: Jean-Louis Chrétien, Emmanuel Lévinas, Simone Weil
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
In this article, I consider the gesture confronted with its own impossibility, in situations that open the gesture to a dimension of transcendence. Focusing first on the event of beauty, as it is discussed by Jean‑Louis Chrétien, and on the encountering of the face, as it is considered by Emmanuel Lévinas, this paper envisions a “below” and a “beyond” of the gesture, in exceptional situations where the gesture is faced with an excess, acquiring a dimension of a theopathy. Subsequently, I emphasize that the transcendence that takes gesture beyond itself can inhabit and nourish the daily gestures, and this can be an occasion of pain and difficulties. In this perspective, Simone Weil shows how the repeated gestures of manual labour can become the mirror of supernatural beauty.
30. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 22
Giulia Lelli L’être des morts selon Jan Patočka
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
In this article, I aim to analyse the way in which Jan Patočka explores the being of the dead in his text “Phenomenology of life after death.” I wish to show that this seminal text offers the solution to three main difficulties regarding the being of the dead: those difficulties concern their form of being, their possibility to transform themselves and their ability to act. Following this analysis, I propose a three‑folded thesis: firstly, the being of the dead can be grasped not only through privation but also through more positive forms; secondly, the dead persons can continue to transform themselves when being construed by the living; and thirdly, their action can be prolonged even though they cannot act.
31. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 22
Eun‑Hye Choo L’autrui dans la sphère la plus originaire: Merleau-Ponty et la théorie husserlienne de l’instinct
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This paper examines the influence that Husserl’s drive/instinct theory has on Merleau‑Ponty’s late philosophy. Husserl’s interest in the passive realm of life develops into a study of a more profound level which even precedes the emergence of subjectivity. We analyze how it leads Merleau‑Ponty, in his philosophy of flesh, to furnish an ontological explanation regarding the problem of the relationship with others. In this regard, we investigate firstly Husserl’s theory of originary affection and its limits, before scrutinizing the notion of empathy; thereby we show how Merleau‑Ponty develops the Husserlian intentional relation into a carnal relation based on the idea that others and I belong to the same world. This will reveal that the relationship with the others always lies in the most profound level of our experience, because we share the ontological affinity, namely, the flesh.
32. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 22
Dominic Nnaemeka Ekweariri Orcid-ID Leiblichkeit comme ouverture au monde chez Marc Richir
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
In phenomenology, Leiblichkeit articulates the idea of subjectivity and the relationship to the world;Leib attests the phenomenological experience of subjects otherwise captured by the term Leiber. Husserl and Merleau‑Ponty have sought to understand this relationship to the world and to characterize this phenomenological experience. Thus, they thematized a form of relationship to the world which is not only intentional but also, and each in his own way, passive and based on image (bildlich). On his part, Marc Richir sought to overcome this idea by bringing an “active, non‑specular mimesis from within” into play. Proposing an examination of these approaches, I defend the idea that in order to be able to think of the openness to the world—which is made possible by corporeality—it is of great necessity here to articulate the dimension ofsense.
33. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 1/2
Jocelyn Benoist Quelques remarques sur la doctrine brentanienne de l’évidence
34. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 1/2
Bruce Bégout Percevoir et Juger: Le rôle de la croyance originelle (urdoxa) dans la théorie du jugement de Husserl
35. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 1/2
Claudio Majolino Le différend logique: jugement et énoncé: Eléments pour une reconstruction du débat entre Husserl et Marty
36. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 1/2
Victor Popescu Espace et mouvement chez Stumpf et Husserl: Une Approche Méréologique
37. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 3/4
Pascal Dupond Nature et Logos: d’une pensée de la fondation (Fundierung) à une pensée de l’entrelacs (Ineinander)
38. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 3/4
Malika Temmar Effets de présence et ostension: Une approche discursive
39. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 3/4
Alain Beaulieu La réforme du concept phénoménologique de «monde» par Gilles Deleuze
40. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 3/4
Éliane Escoubas Merleau-Ponty et l’esthétique