241.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
31 >
Issue: 2
F. Vattioni
3 (1) Re 12, 10; 2 Par (Cr) 10, 10 e Teodoreto di Ciro
|
|
|
242.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
31 >
Issue: 2
Vittorino Grossi
L’auctoritas di Agostino nella dottrina del «peccatum originis» da Cartagine (418) a Trento (1546)
|
|
|
243.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
32 >
Issue: 1
Maria Grazia Mara
Agostino e la polemica Antimanichea:
il ruolo di Paolo e del suo epistolario
|
|
|
244.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
32 >
Issue: 1
Francesco Vattioni
Note di onomastica punica nell’epistolario agostiniano:
(EP. 17,2; 29,12)
|
|
|
245.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
32 >
Issue: 1
Carlo Tibiletti
Nota in margine a idolatria eresia e filolsofia in Tertulliano
|
|
|
246.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
32 >
Issue: 1
Enrico dal Covolo
Ancora Sulla “Statua of Sant’Ippolito”:
Per una “messa a punto” dei rapporti tra i Severi e il cristianesimo
|
|
|
247.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
32 >
Issue: 2
Marialuisa Annecchino Manni
Iob 14,4-5¹ nella lettura dei Padri
|
|
|
248.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
32 >
Issue: 2
Ugo Bianchi
Le origini dello gnosticismo:
Nuovi studi e ricerche
|
|
|
249.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
32 >
Issue: 2
Ubaldo Pizzani
Qualche osservazione sul concetto di armonia cosmica in Agostino e Cassiodoro alla luce di Sap 11,21(20)
|
|
|
250.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
32 >
Issue: 2
Sever J. Voicu
Un frammento copto dell’omelia cattedrale 77 di Severo d’Antiochia
|
|
|
251.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
32 >
Issue: 2
Alberto Camplani
La Quaresima egiziana nel VII secolo:
note di cronologia su Mon. Epiph. 77, Manchester Ryland Suppl. 47-48, P. Grenf. II 112, P. Berol. 10677, P. Köln 215 e un’omelia copta
|
|
|
252.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
32 >
Issue: 2
José Pablo Martín
La saggezza creatrice secondo Teofilo d’Antiochia ed i suoi silenzi cristologici
|
|
|
253.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
33 >
Issue: 1/2
Paolo Siniscalco
Sulla composizione delle comunità cristiane in Africa all’inizio deI V secolo secondo il De catechizandis rudibus di Agostino
|
|
|
254.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
33 >
Issue: 1/2
Giancarlo Rinaldi
Diodoro di Tarso, Antiochia e Ie ragioni della polemica antiallegorista
|
|
|
255.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
33 >
Issue: 1/2
Manlio Simonetti
Due note agostiniane
|
|
|
256.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
33 >
Issue: 1/2
Maria Grazia Mara
L’itinerario dell’uomo secondo Agostino:
da “spirituale” a “carnale”, da “carnale” a “spirituale”
|
|
|
257.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
33 >
Issue: 1/2
Vittorino Grossi
Presentazione
|
|
|
258.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
33 >
Issue: 1/2
Enrico dal Covolo
Bibliografia italiana di mariologia patristica (1962-1992)
|
|
|
259.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
61 >
Issue: 1
Angelo Segneri
Spigolature pseudodidimiane
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
The present study, after a quick codicological investigation of the two surviving manuscripts of the De trinitate by pseudo-Didymus, in which it is concluded that one is a copy of the other, focuses on the lexical analysis of the first book of the mutilated trinitarian treatise. By showing divergences from the authentic works of Didymus, alongside parallels with the writings of the Cappadocian Fathers, Cyril of Alexandria, Theodoret, of other late patristic authors, as well as with those of the Neoplatonic philosophers, in particular Proclus, the author concludes that the chronological position of De trinitate should not be before the end of the 5th century, and suggests a possible origin from an environment of Antiochene influence.
|
|
|
260.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
61 >
Issue: 1
Nello Cipriani
Il De immortalitate animae di Agostino nella critica più recente
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
In De immortalitate animae Augustine is not satisfied with completing his proof of the immortality of the soul – which had been left open in the second book of the Soliloquies –; he also answers some possible objections, demonstrating that the rational soul cannot cease to exist, it cannot die, nor can it change into an irrational body or soul. Furthermore, remaining faithful to the programmatic declaration of never wanting to stray from the authority of Christ (Acad. 3, 20, 43), he specifies the ontological status of the soul by affirming that it is, in itself, mutable and therefore not of a divine nature, as Varro had argued. Nor is it a substance foreign to the body, as the Platonists claimed, because the soul has an appetitus ad corpus and, if it questions itself, it easily discovers that it desires nothing else «except to do something, to know with intelligence or with the senses, or only to live, as far as this is in its power» (nisi agendi aliquid, aut sciendi, aut sentiendi, aut tantummodo vivendi in quantum sua illi potestas est).
|
|
|