101.
|
The CLR James Journal:
Volume >
7 >
Issue: 1
Paula Jean Davis
Anthropology and African Philosophy:
A Review Essay
|
|
|
102.
|
The CLR James Journal:
Volume >
7 >
Issue: 1
Lewis R. Gordon
Wilson Harris:
The New Age in the Mythic Past
|
|
|
103.
|
The CLR James Journal:
Volume >
8 >
Issue: 1
Paget Henry
Lewis Gordon, Phenomenology and Afro-Caribbean Historicism:
A Review Essay
|
|
|
104.
|
The CLR James Journal:
Volume >
8 >
Issue: 2
Peniel E. Joseph
Reconstructing the Dream:
Martin Luther King Jr., Black Radicalism, and African-American Political Thought.
|
|
|
105.
|
The CLR James Journal:
Volume >
8 >
Issue: 2
Paget Henry
On the Revolutionary Pulse of the Caribbean
|
|
|
106.
|
The CLR James Journal:
Volume >
9 >
Issue: 1
Modhurima DasGupta
Vijay Prashad, South Asian American Karma, and the Model Minority Myth Dismantled:
A Review Essay
|
|
|
107.
|
The CLR James Journal:
Volume >
16 >
Issue: 1
Paget Henry
A.R.E Webber: Between Ariel and Caliban
|
|
|
108.
|
The CLR James Journal:
Volume >
16 >
Issue: 1
Clevis Headley
The Existential Turn in African American Philosophy: Disclosing the Existential Phenomenological Foundations of Black Bodies, White Gazes: The Continuing Significance of Race
|
|
|
109.
|
The CLR James Journal:
Volume >
16 >
Issue: 1
Jerome Teelucksingh
Selwyn Ryans, Eric Williams: The Myth and the Man
|
|
|
110.
|
The CLR James Journal:
Volume >
16 >
Issue: 1
Jasleen Salwan
The Future of a System that Characterizes the Past An Exploration of Decolonial Ethics
|
|
|
111.
|
Chiasmi International:
Volume >
4
Pierre Cassou-Noguès
Chair et langage:
Essais sur Merleau-Ponty
|
|
|
112.
|
Chiasmi International:
Volume >
5
Stefen Kristensen
L’expression au-delà de la représentation:
Sur l’aisthêsis et l’esthétique chez Merleau-Ponty
|
|
|
113.
|
Chiasmi International:
Volume >
6
Fabrice Colonna
Du lien des êtres aux éléments de l’être:
Merleau-Ponty au tournant des années 1945-1951
|
|
|
114.
|
Chiasmi International:
Volume >
12
Simone Frangi
Vivant Jusqu’à La Mort (French)
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
Vivant jusqu’à la mortCompte-rendu de A. Cavazzini, A. Gualandi (édité par), Logiche del vivente.Evoluzione, sviluppo, cognizione nell’epistemologia francese contemporanea,“Discipline filosofiche” XIX, I, Quodlibet, Macerata 2009Le nouveau recueil d’essais consacrés à une épistémologie pour la discipline philosophique, sous la direction de A. Cavazzini et A. Gualandi, se structure autourd’une idée forte de Bergson, celle d’ « attention à la vie ». Cette idée est utilisée comme instrument herméneutique pour désigner un aspect de la culture philosophique française du XIXè siècle et de l’époque contemporaine en particulier, qui voit dans l’épistémologie de la biologie un lieu de rencontre entre des perspectives hétérogènes, ainsi qu’un moyen de vérifier l’état actuel des sciences de la vie et d’étudier la possibilité d’une philosophie de la biologie prenant en compte et mettant profit les impulsions des avancées scientifiques. Le recueil cherche à rendre compte de la nouveauté du paradigme biologique contemporain, qui vise un degré extrême de synthèse entre les savoirs et les disciplines liées au « champ biologique ». Logiche del vivente parvient donc à rendre compte de la nouvelle approche synthétique du biologique, ouvrant à ce syncrétisme de positions qui contribue à sa définition contemporaine : évolution, développement et cognition, réunis dans une même perspective, sont les instruments d’une réécriture du vocabulaire et des catégories de la réflexion biologique, indépendamment de l’alternative paralysante entre le « mauvais » vitalisme et le mécanisme.Vivant jusqu’à la mortReview of A. Cavazzini, A. Gualandi (edited by), Logiche del vivente.Evoluzione, sviluppo, cognizione nell’epistemologia francese contemporanea,“Discipline filosofiche” XIX, I, Quodlibet, Macerata 2009Edited by A. Cavazzini and A. Gualandi, this new collection of essays devoted to an epistemology for the philosophical discipline is structured around one of Bergson’s powerful ideas, that of “attention to life.” This idea is used as a hermeneutic structure in order to outline an aspect of the French philosophical culture of the 19th century and of the contemporary epoch in particular. What one sees is that the epistemology of biology is a place of encounter between heterogeneous perspective. As well, it is a means to verify the current state of the life sciences and to study the possibility of a philosophy of biology which would take account of the novelty of the contemporary biological paradigm, a paradigm that aims at an extreme degree of synthesis between the sciences and the disciplines connected to the “biological field.” Logiche del vivente therefore manages to take account of the new synthetic approach of biology, opening itself up to a syncretism of positions which contributes to its contemporary definition: evolution, development and cognition, united in one perspective, are instruments of are-writing of the vocabulary and the categories of biological reflection, independently of the paralyzing alternative be “bad” vitalism and mechanism.
|
|
|
115.
|
The CLR James Journal:
Volume >
28 >
Issue: 1/2
Elisabeth Paquette
Diagne and Amselle’s In Search of Africa(s)
|
|
|
116.
|
Chiasmi International:
Volume >
24
Rajiv Kaushik
Review of Helen A. Fielding’s Cultivating Perception through Artworks: Phenomenological Enactments of Ethics, Politics, and Culture
|
|
|
117.
|
Chiasmi International:
Volume >
24
Bryan Smyth
Review of Galen A. Johnson, Mauro Carbone, and Emmanuel De Saint Aubert. Merleau-Ponty’s Poetic of the World: Philosophy and Literature
|
|
|
118.
|
Chiasmi International:
Volume >
22
Jérôme Melançon
Recension d’Ange Bergson Lendja Ngnemzué, Identité et primauté d’autrui. La philosophie merleau-pontyenne de l’hospitalité
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
The book Identité et primauté d’autrui presents a study of intersubjectivity in Merleau-Ponty. Subjectivity emerges against a background of a world shared with the other, a human world, and is preceded by its relationship to the other. The assumption of the primary character of this relationship takes on the shape of hospitality. Such a politics of hospitality is opposed to state politics aiming for cultural security and the defense of values, taking their origins in neoconservatism and notably deployed against immigration and mixity. This original study of hospitality, departing from Merleau-Ponty in an original manner while remaining anchored in the Phenomenology of Perception, offers a response to the need to protect an unavoidable ontological pluralism.
|
|
|
119.
|
Chiasmi International:
Volume >
22
Martín Miguel Buceta
Compte rendu de Claudio Cormick, Opacidad y relativismo. La situacionalidad del conocimiento en tensión entre Merleau-Ponty y Foucault
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
In Opacidad y relativismo. La situacionalidad del conocimiento en tensión entre Merleau-Ponty y Foucault, Claudio Cormick introduces Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s and Michel Foucault’s philosophies as attempts to face two possible obstacles for human knowledge : on the one hand, the opacity of consciousness with regard to the foundations of its own positions; on the other, the relative, non-absolute character of our claims to truth, inasmuch as they are formulated within concrete social and historical conditions.
|
|
|
120.
|
Chiasmi International:
Volume >
22
Keith Whitmoyer
Review of Mauro Carbone, Philosophy-Screens: From Cinema to the Digital Revolution
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
In this text, my aim is to provide a reading of Mauro Carbone’s Philosophy Screens: From Cinema to the Digital Revolution in the context of his other writings. My claim is that in this most recent work, Carbone makes a decisive step from being an original interpreter of the work of Merleau-Ponty and Proust to making an original contribution to what I describe, following Merleau-Ponty and Carbone, the history of “a-philosophy”: an historical attempt to reverse the “official philosophy” that has been with us since at least Plato. This reversal is staged through a series of concepts, created by Carbone, that I take up here viz à viz Plato’s allegory of the cave: the archescreen, the sensible idea, the screen, and philosophy-cinema (a concept borrowed from Deleuze). Together, these concepts illustrate what I call, borrowing a phrase from Jean-Luc Nancy, a philosophical partance: for Carbone, the work of “philosophizing” should no longer be conceptualized in accordance with Platonic imagery of ascent, illumination, conversion, and importantly, grasping and seizing upon the είδη but as “departure”: allowing the objects of thought their transcendence, a liquidity by which they slip through our grasp.
|
|
|