101.
|
Social Philosophy Today:
Volume >
5
Roger Paden
Four Concepts of Freedom
|
|
|
102.
|
Social Philosophy Today:
Volume >
5
James P. Sterba
Feminist Justice
|
|
|
103.
|
Social Philosophy Today:
Volume >
5
Steven R. Mansfield
Law, Ideology, and Critical Legal Studies
|
|
|
104.
|
Social Philosophy Today:
Volume >
5
Yeager Hudson
Modern Western Constitutionalism and the Separation of Ideology and State
|
|
|
105.
|
Social Philosophy Today:
Volume >
5
Ruth L. Smith
Order and Disorder:
The Naturalization of Poverty
|
|
|
106.
|
Social Philosophy Today:
Volume >
5
Roger J.H. King
Relativism and Moral Critique
|
|
|
107.
|
Social Philosophy Today:
Volume >
5
William W. Clohesy
From the State ofNature to the D.S. Constitution?
|
|
|
108.
|
Social Philosophy Today:
Volume >
5
Karen J. Warren,
Martin Gunderson
The Feminist Critique of Liberalism
|
|
|
109.
|
Social Philosophy Today:
Volume >
5
Paul Weirich
The General Welfare As A Constitutional Goal
|
|
|
110.
|
Social Philosophy Today:
Volume >
5
Ellen Bloom Glass
Countervailing Conditions:
A Way Out of Judicial Precedent
|
|
|
111.
|
Social Philosophy Today:
Volume >
5
C. L. Sheng
A Defense of Utilitarianism Against Rights-Theory
|
|
|
112.
|
Social Philosophy Today:
Volume >
5
Creighton Peden
A Nineteenth Century Constitutional Social Philosopher:
F. E. Abbot
|
|
|
113.
|
Social Philosophy Today:
Volume >
5
Peter P. Cvek
A Re-Examination of John Locke’s Theory of Natural Law and Natural Rights
|
|
|
114.
|
Social Philosophy Today:
Volume >
5
Raphael Sassower
Economics in Context:
The Bicentennial of the Constitution of the U.S.A.
|
|
|
115.
|
Social Philosophy Today:
Volume >
7
Sander Lee
Repaying the Wronged:
Society’s Obligations Towards the Victims of Violent Crime
|
|
|
116.
|
Social Philosophy Today:
Volume >
7
Richard M. Martin
A Philosophical Basis for Biomedical Ethics:
The Principle of the Sanctity of Human Life
|
|
|
117.
|
Social Philosophy Today:
Volume >
7
William E. Murnion
The Foundations of Rights
|
|
|
118.
|
Social Philosophy Today:
Volume >
7
James E. Napier
Hobbes:
On Human Nature and Political Obligation
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
A widely accepted, perhaps prevailing view among Hobbes scholars is that his theory of political obligation is grounded in an egoistic and materialistic view of human nature. There are a number of difficulties with this view, not the least of which is that it seems to make a genuine theory of political obligation impossible. It is the object of the present paper to examine certain aspects of Hobbes's account of human nature, with the object of weaving them together into a single doctrine which is coherent with what he has to say about political obligation. I will conclude by considering briefly how traditional interpretations could have come to prevail.
|
|
|
119.
|
Social Philosophy Today:
Volume >
7
Alan G. Nasser
Freud, Tinkerbell, and the Priority of Sociological to Psychological Understanding
|
|
|
120.
|
Social Philosophy Today:
Volume >
7
Creighton Peden
George Burman Foster’s Social Philosophy of Religion
|
|
|