Displaying: 101-104 of 104 documents

0.036 sec

101. Augustinianum: Volume > 60 > Issue: 1
Raquel Oliva Martínez Orientaciones para el estudio del contenido del Vat. gr. 1196
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Vat. gr. 1196 is a miscellaneous manuscript that contains canonical, synodal and heresiological texts from different authors. These adnotationes offer its own foliation and contents.
102. Augustinianum: Volume > 60 > Issue: 2
Joel Varela Rodríguez Isidoro de Sevilla ante Gregorio Magno: aspectos de la teología moral
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This article studies Isidore of Seville’s reception of the moral theology of Gregory the Great. Examples will be offered from the Expositio in Vetus Testamentum and the second book of the Differentiae; the moral project of the Sententiae will also be explored. The most significant conclusion is that Isidore refuses to reproduce the most relevant innovations of Gregory’s teaching on charity.
103. Augustinianum: Volume > 62 > Issue: 2
Jeronimo Leal La prosa métrica en Tertuliano (con un estudio estilístico del De testimonio animae)
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This paper is about the integration between metrical clausulae and rhetorical structure. First, there is a comparison of Waszink’s results using the Zielinski method with Laurand’s system, and my findings on the same group of clausulae. Secondly, we analyze the concluding words of every book of Tertullian, to identify the more frequent clausulae, and the initial words, in which we can find often a cretic. Thirdly, we analyze the metrical prose of Tertullian’s De testimonio animae, to establish a rhetorical scheme for the very first time.
104. Augustinianum: Volume > 63 > Issue: 1
Patricio de Navascués Aquam, tenebras, abyssum, chaos: acerca de los “ofitas” de Iren., haer. 1, 30, 1
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The article discusses the meaning of chaos in the series of four elements introduced by Irenaeus in haer. 1, 30, 1 to characterize the system of the so-called “Ophites”. Contrary to the explanation that renders this Gnostic system dualistic, it is argued here that, in reality, the “Ophites” of Irenaeus anticipates what we find in other Gnostic families (Naassenes, On the Origin of the World, The Hypostasis of the Archonts) and continues the Orphic tradition that appeared in the Theogony of Jerome and Hellanicus, in which the eternal chaos had been domesticated with the Jewish monotheism of Genesis, and, according to which, this chaos would come to be something like a “hollow”, not eternal, which precedes the material world, shelters it and then favors the appearance of the corporeal. Its status as a Principle should always be understood in a derivative sense, with no obstacle to monism: the Primordial Light (Lumen primum), the only absolute principle, provokes the appearance of the region of the shadow (chaos), but it does so indirectly through the intermediate veil (Spiritus Sanctus). Nothing justifies speaking, therefore, of the “Ophite” system as an ontologically dualistic system.