1.
|
NTU Philosophical Review:
Year >
2011 >
Issue: 42
王文 方
Wen-fang Wang
N.J. Smith 之《含混性與真之程度》
Nicholas J. J. Smith, Vagueness and Degrees of Truth
|
|
|
2.
|
NTU Philosophical Review:
Year >
1971 >
Issue: 1
林正弘
R. M. Martin 著Truth and Denotation 商榷
|
|
|
3.
|
NTU Philosophical Review:
Year >
1972 >
Issue: 2
趙天儀
現代美學
|
|
|
4.
|
NTU Philosophical Review:
Year >
1972 >
Issue: 2
王曉波
平凡的道德觀
|
|
|
5.
|
NTU Philosophical Review:
Year >
2015 >
Issue: 50
劉作
Zuo Liu
活的黑格爾─評劉創馥教授的《黑格爾新釋》
Living Hegel: Comment on Prof. Chong-Fuk Lau's A New Interpretation of Hegel
|
|
|
6.
|
NTU Philosophical Review:
Year >
2017
楊德立
Tak-Lap Yeung
評After Hegel: German Philosophy, 1840-1900
A Review of After Hegel: German Philosophy, 1840-1900
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
相比十九世紀後半葉的德國哲學,哲學學者與史家一般更注重前半葉的成就。Frederick Beiser 這本著作,正是針對這種情況而寫。他認為十九世紀後半葉被過度簡化和忽略,其實相對於前半葉,後半葉甚至「更重要和哲學上更有趣」,而通過新的敘事和理論重構,該能賦予其應得的重視。為此,作者鑄造了五條不同的歷史線索,包括新「康德主義的興起」、「物質主義的爭論」、「歷史主義的發展」、「現代邏輯的根源」、「悲觀主義的冒起」,讓讀者以不同角度,重新認識這段歷史。他以發掘失落的傳統為己任,對於志同道合的讀者而言,這書當然對味,然而,若要讓讀者公平、恰當地了解當時的思潮,從另一角度而言,書名引來的期望或未盡相符。作者的學術素養無容置疑,本書豐富的資料和清晰的整理,能讓無論是否熟悉該段哲學史的讀者皆耳目一新。若讀者能自行把當中的細節,放到更大的歷史脈絡看,相信會對此書有更正面的評價、獲益更多。
In contrast with the late 19th century German Philosophy, most historians of philosophy emphasize the achievements of the first half of the century. In After Hegel: German Philosophy, 1840-1900, Frederick Beiser stands against this academic current and coins five different narratives, including “the rise of neo-Kantianism”, “the materialism controversy”, “the growth of historicism”, “the root of modern logic”, “the rise of pessimism” to allow readers to reengage with the second half of the 19th century. He takes the responsibility of enlivening the so-called “lost traditions”, and of course, for those readers who have similar taste and interest, this book is their cup of tea. However, if we, by the name of the book, anticipate this work to illustrate a general picture of the “mainstream” philosophical traditions from those times, we may be disappointed. From the academic point of view, this book is certainly well written, with rich references and a comprehensive understanding of the related topics. Through Beiser’s reconstruction of the philosophical controversies, the stiff narratives of the history of philosophy can be softened and refreshed. If the readers themselves are able to incorporate the details provided by the book into the wider historical context and the specific problems in the history of philosophy, the reward can be even bigger.
|
|
|
7.
|
NTU Philosophical Review:
Year >
2020 >
Issue: 60
楊德立
Tak-lap Yeung
解讀及評價:
Rolf-Peter Horstmann《康德之想像力》
Interpretation and evaluation
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
Rolf-Peter Horstmann 近作《康德之想像力》(Kant’s Power of Imagination),是針對「想像力」在康德學統下備受忽視的情況而作。這部102 頁的著作,仔細分析了《純粹理性批判》和《判斷力批判》中與想像力相關的內容,意圖從內部理順康德的想像力理論,並論證想像力在建構認知對象過程裡的獨特貢獻。他提出了「建構認知對象的兩階段模式」,闡明想像力在認知過程中獨一無二的功能與位置,並在此基礎上論證想像力是一種獨立、自足的認知能力。由於想像力是一種獨立認知能力,因此至少在理論哲學和知識論脈絡下,康德學者沒有忽視想像力的理由。
Rolf-Peter Horstmann’s recent work, Kant's Power of Imagination, is a response to the neglect of “the power of imagination” in the Kantian circle. In this 102-page book, Horstmann analyzes passages relevant to imagination in Critique of Pure Reason and Critique of Judgment in detail, with the aim of making Kant’s theory of imagination coherent. He argues for the unique contribution of imagination in the context of the constitution of cognitive objects. Horstmann proposes a “two-stage model of constructing cognitive objects” in his examination of the irreplaceable function and special position of imagination in the cognitive process, and from this, he argues that imagination is an independent, self-standing cognitive faculty. Since imagination is an independent cognitive ability, at least in the context of theoretical philosophy and epistemology, Kant scholars have no reason to ignore it.
|
|
|
8.
|
NTU Philosophical Review:
Year >
1973 >
Issue: 3
林正弘
的簡單性理論, Mary Hesse 論Nelson Goodman
|
|
|
9.
|
NTU Philosophical Review:
Year >
2022 >
Issue: 63
夏逸平
Yi-Ping Xia
評Christian J. Emden, Nietzsche’s Naturalism. Philosophy and the Life Sciences in the Nineteenth Century
A Review of Christian J. Emden’s Nietzsche’s Naturalism. Philosophy and the Life Sciences in the Nineteenth Century
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
尼采的自然主義或者尼采作為自然主義者可以說是過去二十年英美尼 采學界最為熱門的研究論題之一,而在所有相關作品中,Christian Emden 的《尼采的自然主義》則憑藉其出色的歷史脈絡化工作以及對哲學問題的敏 銳關注而成為尼采研究領域不可忽略的著作。在書中,Emden 在十九世紀早 期新康德主義以及生命科學的脈絡下重構了尼采的自然主義,並認為尼采的 系譜學提供了對規範性的一個自然歷史的詮釋。本文將首先簡介在英美以及 德國學界所展開的對尼采自然主義詮釋的爭論,接著概覽Emden 一書的章 節內容,隨後介紹以及評論此書的核心觀點,最後則以對當代尼采研究的簡 短反思作為結論
Nietzsche’s naturalism or Nietzsche as a naturalist could be regarded as one of the hottest research topics in Anglo-American Nietzsche studies in the past twenty years. Of all the related works, Christian Emden’s Nietzsche’s Naturalism is indispensable in the field of Nietzsche studies for its excellent historical contextualization and keen attention to philosophical problems. In this book, he reconstructs Nietzsche’s philosophical naturalism in the context of early neo-Kantianism and the life sciences in the nineteenth century and interprets Nietzsche’s genealogy as a philosophical critique that delivers a natural history of normativity. This review will begin with a brief introduction of the debate around Nietzsche’s naturalism in Anglo-American and German scholarship, then give an overview of the chapters in Emden’s book. After introducing and commenting on Emden’s core ideas, it will conclude with a brief reflection on contemporary Nietzsche studies.
|
|
|
10.
|
NTU Philosophical Review:
Year >
2022 >
Issue: 63
楊德立
Tak-lap Yeung
評關子尹《徘徊於天人之際:海德格的哲學思路》
A Critique from an Enlightenment Humanist: A Review of Tze-wan Kwan’s The Way betwixt Being and Man: On Heidegger’s Philosophical Detours
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
關子尹《徘徊於天人之際:海德格的哲學思路》共收十一篇長論文,而 最引人注目的,是三篇從未發表的長文。三篇內容皆論及海德格整個思想生 涯,但就問題意識而言,則偏重海氏後期旨趣,而且內容具延續性,值得一 拼閱讀及討論。 通過對新三篇的闡釋可見,此書並非單從釋義的角度來談論海德格哲 學。經過全書梳理各種在海德格哲學中極為斑駁甚至跡近奧密的主題及義理 後,其理論後果得以客觀且具體地呈現眼前,而作者則對此作出了極為全 面、深刻且嚴厲的批判。對海德格的整體批評,主要為兩點:一,海氏對主 體性的批判過於嚴苛,連帶對個人能動性所構成的個人責任亦過於輕視; 二,海氏對人類理性過於不信任。這兩要點遍佈全書,在某些篇章特別明確, 而這些批評,實立足於一個具有現代啟蒙精神的人文主義者的立場之上。
Tze-wan Kwan’s The Way betwixt Being and Man: On Heidegger’s Philosophical Detours contains a total of eleven long essays, the most notable of which are the three long essays that have never been published. All three articles deal with Heidegger’s entire intellectual career, but in terms of philosophical orientation, they focus mainly on Heidegger’s later interests. Therefore, they are worth reading and discussing as a whole because of the continuity in content. Through the exposition of the three new essays, it can be seen that this book does not discuss Heidegger’s philosophy merely for the purpose of interpreting his concepts and statements. After sorting out the various themes and meanings in Heidegger’s philosophy, which are extremely diverse and even close to esoteric, the theoretical consequences are revealed concretely and objectively, and, in addition, the author provides an extremely comprehensive, profound, and severe critique of them. The overall criticism of Heidegger is mainly about two points: first, Heidegger’s criticism of subjectivity is too strict and, consequently, he underestimates the personal responsibility constituted by individual spontaneity; second, Heidegger is too distrustful of human reason. These two points, while more explicitly stated in some chapters, animate the whole book. I argue that the criticism comes from the perspective of a humanist with the spirit of modern enlightenment.
|
|
|