LOGIN
PRODUCTS
All Products
Online Resources
Journals & Series
Digital Media
Books & Reference Works
E-Collection
About
Alphabetically
By Category
Price Lists
Terms and Conditions
MEMBERSHIPS
Societies & Associations
Conference Registrations
SERVICES
Conference Exhibits
Conference Registrations
Electronic Publishing
Journal Advertising
Mailing Lists
Marketing Services
Membership Services
Production Typesetting
Subscription Fulfillment
ABOUT
About us
Contact
FAQs
Order Info
Privacy
Support
Search narrowed by:
Quaestiones Disputatae
[x]
Narrow search
Skip category
By category:
Catholic Tradition
2
Contemporary Philosophy
2
Skip publication type
By publication type:
Journal
2
Skip language
By language:
English
2
Skip journals
By journals:
Quaestiones Disputatae
2
Skip document type
By document type:
Article
2
Search for:
"abstract objects"
<< advanced search
ADVANCED SEARCH
Options
First part
All, Text, Title, Author, Abstract
All
Text
Title
Author
Abstract
or
and
Second part (optional)
All, Text, Title, Author, Abstract
All
Text
Title
Author
Abstract
or
and
Third part (optional)
All, Text, Title, Author, Abstract
All
Text
Title
Author
Abstract
Type of search
All of the words
Any of the words
Date range (years)
from
to
Clear
Results per page:
20
50
100
Sort by:
Relevance
Date - recent first
Date - oldest first
Title
Publication
Author
Displaying: 1-2 of 2 documents
0.185 sec
1.
Quaestiones Disputatae:
Volume
>
7
>
Issue: 1
Horacio M. R. Banega
Husserl’s Diagrams and Models of Immanent Temporality
abstract
|
view
|
rights & permissions
The aim of this article is to clarify how Husserl applies his formal ontology to the constitution of immanent temporality. By doing so, my objective is to unravel the relationships between the phases of this temporality that make up a unit—that is, the relationship between protentions and retentions and a proto-impression that gives rise to the temporal moment “now” in an experience of the immanent consciousness. In connection with this reconstruction, I will attempt to clarify Husserl’s definition of time as a “one-dimensional orthoid multiplicity,” the roots of which lie in Riemann’s work. I interpret Husserl’s description as a model for the description of the phenomenon of time. Its nature as a model seems to unfold with the problem of the time diagram. Which diagram best represents the constitution of immanent temporality? Larrabee has discussed this issue, and I propose that the best interpretation of the diagram is to consider it as applying to a spherical surface rather than a flat one. This interpretation allows us to account for the multiple relationships among presentations, memories, and other presentifications in an empirically appropriate manner while at the same time providing us with another vision of Husserl’s consciousness, which allows us to reconsider the relationship between subjectivity and objectivity.
SHARE
2.
Quaestiones Disputatae:
Volume
>
9
>
Issue: 1
Eduardo Echeverria
The Splendor of Truth in Fides et Ratio
view
|
rights & permissions
.... Says Plantinga, “Your true Platonist . . . doesn’t hold merely that [
abstract
...
objects
as propositions, possible worlds, numbers, and properties] exist; she ...
SHARE