Displaying: 1-5 of 5 documents

0.046 sec

1. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 2 > Issue: 3/4
Ion Tănăsescu Intenţionalitatea în exegeza brentaniană schiţa unei polemici
2. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 2 > Issue: 3/4
Victor Popescu Persoană, valori şi afectivitate scheler – o fenomenologie în răspăr
3. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 3/4
Paul Marinescu Orcid-ID Adevǎr şi istorie: Enigma Reprezentǎrii Trecutului
4. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 1 > Issue: 3/4
Gabriel Cercel Fenomenologia între Bewusstsein şi Dasein Note pe marginea unei noi interpretări
5. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 1 > Issue: 3/4
Mihail Neamţu „Născut, iar nu făcut“ Note despre filozofia Revelaţiei la Michel Henry
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This paper guides the Romanian reader through a variety of discussions surrounding the central themes of Michel Henry’s latest books (C’est moi la Vérité,1996; Incarnation, 2000). Basically, it aims to present the principles of the phenomenology of Life in Henry’s thought, focusing on the status of the apparition, and of truth, both of which are to be understood not as the ontic relation of adaequatio, but as the self-revelation of Life in the immanence of each non-intentional experience. My review-article draws upon the problem of the ‘original impression’, a crucial stage in shifting the theme of the ‘transcendental body’ and of the ‘self-affection’. At this point, my interpretation suggests that Henry’s phenomenology of affection would require further stark distinctions like the one between the ‘corporeal pain’ and the ‘transcendental sufferance’, very significant from the Christian viewpoint, too. I also try to suggest the importance of Henry’s phenomenology of Life for a radical understanding of bioethics. In addition, I tackle Michel Henry’s strong critique of the autistic sexual love, which sounds strikingly similarly to those raised up, respectively, by S. Kierkegaard and J.-L. Marion. Eventually, my essential claim is that one should reconsider very seriously the importance of the Christian mystical theology (best represented by the Patristic tradition) in order to get an adequate understanding of Michel Henry’s radical phenomenology of Life.