Already a subscriber? - Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Browse by:



Displaying: 41-60 of 770 documents


book reviews

41. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 25 > Issue: 2
Anwar D. Uhuru

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
42. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 25 > Issue: 2
Dana Rognlie

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
43. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 25 > Issue: 2
Andrew Pierce

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
44. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 25 > Issue: 2
Erica Bigelow Orcid-ID

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
45. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 25 > Issue: 2
Shari Stone-Mediatore

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

46. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 25 > Issue: 2

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

47. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 25 > Issue: 1
Harry van der Linden, Amy E. Wendling

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

articles

48. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 25 > Issue: 1
Patrick Anderson

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Leftist political theory remains trapped between two dominant conceptions of sovereignty: the liberal conception of popular sovereignty and the decisionist conception of sovereignty as the power to declare a state of exception. This essay offers a historical critique of the liberal and decisionist conceptions of sovereignty and develops a descriptive theory of aristocratic sovereignty, which is more suited to the history and the needs of radical political theory and praxis. By tracing the genealogy of sovereignty through early modern European political thought to the founding of the United States, this essay reveals the debilitating shortcoming of notions of sovereignty derived from both Carl Schmitt and the liberal tradition and provides a basis for a distinctively radical analysis of the sovereign aristocracy in Amerika.
49. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 25 > Issue: 1
John Kaiser Ortiz

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This essay elaborates on Rodolfo Corky Gonzales’s “Yo soy Joaquín” as an inter-American articulation of the critical commitments of Chicanismo, which is here identified as the sociopolitical philosophy and ideological/normative leanings of Mexican Americans who call(ed) themselves Chicanas/os. The purpose of this essay is to show both how syncretism frames Chicanismo as a philosophy of growth and identity beyond borders and that this worldview can be critically explained as seeking alliances to communities and contexts defined by struggle. It engages the historical groundwork, philosophical influences on, and cultural ideals and values voiced through this poem by proponents of Chicanismo among its multiple forms and various representatives.
50. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 25 > Issue: 1
Jon Mahoney

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
In the United States, Protestant Christian identity is the dominant religious identity. Protestant Christian identity confers status privileges, yet also creates objectionable status inequalities. Historical and contemporary evidence includes the unfair treatment of Mormons, Native Americans, Muslims, and other religious minorities. Protestant Christian supremacy also plays a significant role in bolstering anti LGBTQ prejudice, xenophobia, and white supremacy. Ways that Protestant Christian identity correlates with objectionable status inequalities are often neglected in contemporary political philosophy. This paper aims to make a modest contribution towards filling that gap. Some forms of inequality linked to Protestant Christian supremacy can be characterized as domination and oppression. Other instances include barriers to fair equality of opportunity for self-determination. Adapting ideas from egalitarian political philosophy I propose an analysis of objectionable status inequality rooted in Protestant Christian supremacy. Alan Patten’s defense of an egalitarian principle for assessing the effects of law and policy is helpful for this task.
51. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 25 > Issue: 1
Elizabeth Portella Orcid-ID

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
In this article, the author argues that anti-colonial Marxism has been obscured and distorted by the contemporary post-Cold War imaginary. The author analyzes the historical-political context in which the narrative of Marxism and decolonization develop during and after the Cold War. Focusing on the writings of Frantz Fanon, Amílcar Cabral, Thomas Sankara, and Ernesto “Che” Guevara, the author reconstructs the “principles” of anti-colonial Marxism, attempting to ameliorate the scholarly deficit of theoretical literature on the anti-colonial Marxist tradition. In conclusion, the author argues that the “revolutionary theory” of these thinkers remains relevant to persistent, present-day conditions of neocolonialism and capitalist imperialism, becoming increasingly relevant with the progression of catastrophic climate change.

book reviews

52. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 25 > Issue: 1
James Boettcher Orcid-ID

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
53. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 25 > Issue: 1
Alan Chavoya

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
54. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 25 > Issue: 1
Stefan Gandler, Sandra Loyoyla Guizar

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
55. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 25 > Issue: 1
José Jorge Mendoza Orcid-ID

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
56. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 25 > Issue: 1
Jorge Montiel

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
57. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 25 > Issue: 1
Thomas Nail

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
58. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 25 > Issue: 1
Justin Pack

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
59. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 25 > Issue: 1
Charles Reitz Orcid-ID

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

60. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 25 > Issue: 1

view |  rights & permissions | cited by