Browse by:



Displaying: 21-40 of 71 documents


fe de erratas

21. Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science: Volume > 11 > Issue: 2
Victor Sanchez de Zavala

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

in memoriam

22. Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science: Volume > 11 > Issue: 2
Roberto J. Vernengo

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
23. Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science: Volume > 11 > Issue: 2
Javier de Lorenzo

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

recensiones / book reviews

24. Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science: Volume > 11 > Issue: 2
Juan Bautista Bengoetxea

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
25. Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science: Volume > 11 > Issue: 2
José Francisco Martinez Solano

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
26. Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science: Volume > 11 > Issue: 2
Marek Polański

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
27. Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science: Volume > 11 > Issue: 2
Agustín Gonzalez Ruiz

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
28. Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science: Volume > 11 > Issue: 2
José Manuel de Cozar

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
29. Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science: Volume > 11 > Issue: 2
Javier Echeverria

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
30. Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science: Volume > 11 > Issue: 2
Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
31. Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science: Volume > 11 > Issue: 2
José Luis Perez Triviño

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
32. Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science: Volume > 11 > Issue: 2

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

cronicas y proximas reuniones / notices and announcements

33. Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science: Volume > 11 > Issue: 2

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

34. Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science: Volume > 11 > Issue: 2

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

35. Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science: Volume > 11 > Issue: 2

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

36. Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science: Volume > 11 > Issue: 2

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

37. Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science: Volume > 11 > Issue: 2

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

presentacion

38. Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science: Volume > 11 > Issue: 1
Javier Echeverria, Andoni Ibarra

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
39. Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science: Volume > 11 > Issue: 1
Javier Echeverria, Andoni Ibarra

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

seccion monografica

40. Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science: Volume > 11 > Issue: 1
Carlos Pereda

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Las preguntas importantes, o que parecen importantes, no tienen por qué tener respuestas importantes, incluso no tienen por qué tener respuestas. Me propongo explorar qué respuestas, importantes o no importantes, puede recibir, si es que puede recibir alguna respuesta, la importante pregunta “¿qué es un buen argumento?”.Important questions, or questions that seem important, need not have important answers, moreover, they need not have answers at all. I propose to explore what answers, whether important or not, we could obtain, if some answer can be obtained at all, to the important question “what is a good argument?”.