22.
|
Studia Phaenomenologica:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 1/2
Rainer Schubert
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
The author argues that in Sein und Zeit Heidegger speaks about knowledge only in negative terms (as Ent-weltlichung) and thus he is missing the possibility of a synthesis between our being-in-the-world and our knowledge of objects. Consequently, the discussion of all instruments, ready-to-hand for knowing something, does not take place. All measuring instruments represent exactly the link between the pragmatic and the theoretical level of human existence. The essay comes to the conclusion, that the lack of any positive description concerning the ontological possibility of the synthesis between existential and categorical analyssis is the reason for the gap between Heidegger’s philosophy and the world of quantifying sciences.
|
|
23.
|
Studia Phaenomenologica:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 1/2
Delia Popa
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
The three books recently published by C. Romano reconsider the phenomenological senses of world and time starting from the event as original phenomena. This review-article explores the new method that he propose, called “evenimential hermeneutics”, as applied to the relation to ourselves, to the world and to the general sense of being. These analyses lean upon an original way of thinking time, as born in each “sudden” moment. The paper also draws comparisons with Heidegger, Husserl and Lévinas, while proposing a critical point of view on Romano’s thesis, concerning the relationship between the novelty of the event and the past, and its relation with desire and otherness.
|
|
24.
|
Studia Phaenomenologica:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 1/2
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
François RAFFOUL, A chaque fois mien. Heidegger et la question du sujet (Servanne Jollivet); Jean GRONDIN, Le tournant herméneutique de la phenomenologie (Paul Marinescu); Alexander SCHNELL, La genèse de l'apparaître (Denisa Butnaru); James R. MENSCH, Ethics and Selfhood. Alterity and the Phenomenology of Obligation (Horaţiu Crişan)
|
|