|
21.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
27 >
Issue: 2
Langdon Gilkey
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
Gilkey's paper had two parts. Part I, Analysis and Theses, is reproduced here only slightly altered. Part II, Narrative, though extremely rich and moving, is heavily summarized. Then his concluding remarks are presented practically in the precise form in which he presented them.
|
|
|
|
22.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
27 >
Issue: 2
Terry Godlove
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
Godlove argues that Dauenhauer, whatever the merits of Silence,suffers from a fundamental confusion about the topic of silence itself. Godlove's paper is presented here in its entirety.
|
|
|
|
23.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
27 >
Issue: 2
David Pellauer
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
Pellauer's programmatic study neatly differentiates what he takes to he a proper phenomenology of religion from the works of W. Bede Kristensen, Cornelius Bleeker and Gerhard van der Leeuw. Following Husser's lead, but leaving aside Husser's idealism, Pellauer suggests that Husserl provides a useful theoretical model of experience, one which is "hypothetically applicable to all human experience." Pellauer then critically explores Husser's model. This exploration opens the way for Pellauer to suggest important ways in which the phenomenon of silence should he examined, ways not developed in Dauenhauer's study. What follows is the slightly edited second half of Pellauer's contribution.
|
|
|
|
24.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
27 >
Issue: 2
John McCarthy
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
McCarthy provided the audience with a concise summary of the basic approach and central theses of the common text. He then posed two substantial questions. The first concerned the possibility of extending the analysis of discourse and silence to deal with non-senseful "utterance." The second dealt with the relation between the concept of silence proposed by Dauenhauer and Ricoeur's concept of distantiation. What follows is an edited version of his paper.
|
|
|
|
25.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
27 >
Issue: 2
Bernard Dauenhauer
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
What follows is a revised version of Dauenhauer's original response to the panelist's presentations.
|
|
|
|
26.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
27 >
Issue: 2
C. R. Bukala
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
27.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
27 >
Issue: 2
David K. Coe
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
28.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
27 >
Issue: 1
Timothy J. Stapleton
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
29.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
27 >
Issue: 1
Robert R. Williams
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
30.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
27 >
Issue: 1
George J. Stack
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
31.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
27 >
Issue: 1
James Buchanan
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
32.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
27 >
Issue: 1
Randy L. Maddox
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
33.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
27 >
Issue: 1
Patrick K. Dooley, Raymond J. Ring
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|