Already a subscriber? - Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Browse by:



Displaying: 21-38 of 38 documents


part iv—reviews

21. Catholic Social Science Review: Volume > 10
James Knotwell

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
22. Catholic Social Science Review: Volume > 10
Augusta Gooch

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
23. Catholic Social Science Review: Volume > 10
W.P. Haggerty

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
24. Catholic Social Science Review: Volume > 10
Arthur Hippler

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
25. Catholic Social Science Review: Volume > 10
Stephen M. Krason

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
26. Catholic Social Science Review: Volume > 10
Stephen M. Krason

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
27. Catholic Social Science Review: Volume > 10
Mary Ann Kreitzer

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
28. Catholic Social Science Review: Volume > 10
Daniel C. O'Connell, S.J.

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
29. Catholic Social Science Review: Volume > 10
Daniel C. O'Connell, S.J.

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
30. Catholic Social Science Review: Volume > 10
Brian Simboli

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

part v—public and church affairs

31. Catholic Social Science Review: Volume > 10
Patrick G.D. Riley

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
The author discusses the effects of contraception, which have borne out the predictions of Pope Paul VI's encyclical Humanae Vitae: the explosion of out-of-wedlock births, lack of respect for women, STD's, HIV/AIDS, etc. The overpopulation claims that fed the acceptance and promotion of contraception have been discredited by demographers; now the social costs of underpopulation are increasingly apparent. Acceptance of contraception has now also led to an embracing of morally objectionable technologies like cloning. This is the latest consequence of the separation of sex and reproduction signaled by the acceptance of contraception.
32. Catholic Social Science Review: Volume > 10
Society of Catholic Social Scientists - Philippines Chapter

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This is a position paper presented by the Society of Catholic Social Scientists Philippines Chapter reacting to House Bills No.16, 2029, 2042 and 2550 in the Congress of the Philippines, which are measures to control population growth in the Philippines
33. Catholic Social Science Review: Volume > 10
Stephen M. Krason

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
The author argues that there are serious problems from the standpoint of Catholic social teaching (as well as traditional Western thought and simple prudence) in making the forcible spreading of democracy an objective of U.S. foreign policy. He argues that U.S. policy, in light of Catholic social teaching, should be prudently interventionist—but not primarily in a military sense—in promoting human rights, diffusing international tensions, and peacekeeping. Also, the author discusses such questions as shaping U.S. foreign policy in conjunction with allies and foreign aid, in light of Catholic social teaching.
34. Catholic Social Science Review: Volume > 10
Stephen M. Krason

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
The author notes how American public policy typically springs from good intentions, but brings unforeseeable consequences that cause new social problems. It also increasingly seeks to address speculative, not actual or certain, harms. He gives numerous examples and argues that the effect is increasingly expansive state power and heightened intrusion into private areas of individual and family lives. He also argues that all three public policy trends grow out of modern utopian tendencies and secularism.

part vi—documentation

35. Catholic Social Science Review: Volume > 10

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
36. Catholic Social Science Review: Volume > 10
Stratford Caldecott

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
37. Catholic Social Science Review: Volume > 10

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
38. Catholic Social Science Review: Volume > 10

view |  rights & permissions | cited by