Already a subscriber? - Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Browse by:



Displaying: 1-20 of 86 documents


1. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 16 > Issue: 10
Małgorzara Czarnocka

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

soldier and prisoner

2. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 16 > Issue: 10
Wacław Sadkowski

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
3. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 16 > Issue: 10
Witold Kieżun “Wypad”

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
4. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 16 > Issue: 10
Witold Kieżun

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

discussions on witold kieżun’s life and work

5. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 16 > Issue: 10
Charles McMillan

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
The explosion of academic research in organizational studies provides new understanding of organizational and human behavior. The life of Witold Kieżun, a man of action and a first class scholar, parallels this scientific work, where he directly experienced vast changes in the socialist economies of Eastern Europe and the Soviet Empire, and the academic studies of organizations in North America and Western Europe. His primary interest what is managerial decision-making, and the various tools and constraints that lead to superior outcomes.

scholar

6. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 16 > Issue: 10
Witold Kieżun

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

conferring the title of doctor honoris causa on witold kieżun

7. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 16 > Issue: 10
Stefan Kwiatkowski

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
8. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 16 > Issue: 10
Zofia Mikołajczyk

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
9. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 16 > Issue: 10
Wojciech Gasparski

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
10. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 16 > Issue: 10
Leszek Pasieczny

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
11. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 16 > Issue: 10
Witold Kieżun

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
12. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 16 > Issue: 10
Witold Olgierd Kieżun (Witold Kieżun’s son)

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

13. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 16 > Issue: 7/9
The Editor

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

14. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 16 > Issue: 7/9
Wacław Sadkowski

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

memory and significance of the warsaw uprising of 1944

15. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 16 > Issue: 7/9
Jerzy Kłoczowski

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
The author, an insurgent and a historian, presents a series of remarks on the subject of the Warsaw Uprising and related research work. Among others, he points to the necessity of establishing an Institute that would research the issues in a complex way and demands speeding up the work on critical papers about military actions by the insurgent forces; he also remarks that the Polish insurgents, without knowing it, became the defenders of Europe’s freedom against Stalinism. There is mention that Warsaw constituted a monument to “Nazi Barbarity”, as well as Polish-Polish controversies on the issue of the Uprising, that still remain, even today.
16. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 16 > Issue: 7/9
Jan Strzelecki

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
The author recounts his part in the Warsaw Uprising through the prism of general human concepts like brotherhood, death, faith, freedom, memory, etc. in an attempt to show what such ideals meant for his comrades in battle and himself, how they functioned in later years—and how they influenced his generation's world outlook and life. For Strzelecki the Warsaw Uprising stood in defense of supreme human values, was a necessity without which there would have been no hope of survival either for human values or the Polish nation.
17. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 16 > Issue: 7/9
Witold Kieżun

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
World War II broke out as the result of an alliance between Germany and Soviet Union with the aim to conquer and partition Poland. Having broken off the treaty of friendship and co-operation, Germany attacked the USSR in 1941, forcing the Soviet Union to change sides from that of a German ally to the ally of the anti-German coalition. In 1943, following the German discovery of the graves of Polish officers murdered by Soviet forces in Katyń, Stalin declared that the crime had been committed by the German army and broke off diplomatic relations with the Polish Government-in-Exile in London which had requested that an official investigation be launched by the Red Cross committee in Geneva. Some one hundred German officers were sentenced to death for the Katyń massacre as the result of Stalin’s prosecution trials. 50 years later, the world was rocked by the discovery of a document signed by Stalin ordering the execution of Polish officers in Katyń.In a secret meeting in 1943 in Teheran, President Roosevelt and Stalin agreed on the plan to annex Poland’s eastern territories.The decision to stage an independent fight for independence during the Warsaw Uprising was justified by the inevitable approach of the Red Army, the fear of German reprisal actions for disobeying the order to participate in fortification works, the fear of a spontaneous uprising fuelled by a Soviet radio broadcast in Polish which appealed to the people of Warsaw to put up a fight against the oppressor.Stalin’s decision to withhold the Soviet offensive and ban American and British planes carrying humanitarian aid for Warsaw from landing in Soviet airports contributed to the downfall of the Uprising. The Warsaw Uprising was a cue for the civil outbreaks that followed in Slovakia, Romania, Bulgaria, Paris and Prague. The halt on the Soviet Army’s offensive, which enabled the German forces to eliminate the Polish centre of political command subordinate to the Government-in-Exile in London, limited the European territory that fell subject to Soviet supremacy. The memory of the heroic fight put up by the entire population of Warsaw deterred the Soviet Union’s ambitions to curtail Poland’s sovereignty.
18. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 16 > Issue: 7/9
Marian Marek Drozdowski

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
In 1944, American Polonia consisted of two separate social groups. The first one was the so-called “old Polonia”. This group was significantly assimilated into America’s culture and way of life, and had strong self-help organizations. The second group, “new Polonia”, was formed of wartime émigrés, mainly with intellectual backgrounds. They experienced at first hand the anti-human policies of the Nazi and Soviet systems.In the Polish American Congress, founded in 1944 by representatives of both groups, there was great concern about the policies of President Franklin D. Roosevelt. The fear was that these policies would allow Stalin, by a method of fait accompli, to introduce the Soviet system in all countries “liberated” by the Red Army. Old Polonia was under the influence of the US Administration and, despite reservations, supported the approach of Polish Prime Minister Stanisław Mikołajczyk who was committed to finding a Polish-Soviet compromise. Such a compromise turned out to be impossible because of Stalin’s demands. Firstly, nearly 50% of the pre-war territory of Poland was to be ceded to the Soviet Union. Secondly, fundamental changes were to be made in the government leadership of the Polish satellite state.New Polonia, which in 1942 formed the National Committee of Americans of Polish Descent, had a strong intellectual group. They warned the Polish American Congress and the US Administration against conceding to Stalin’s demands. From the perspective of the Sixtieth Anniversary of the Warsaw Uprising, their evaluation of Stalin’s policy has turned out to be correct.There was also a small group of Polish American activists centered around Professor Oskar Lange and the eminent poet Julian Tuwim, who belonged to the so-called Kościuszko League. During the Warsaw Uprising they were willing to accept Stalin’s demands and in connection with this supported the policies of the Polish Committee for National Liberation (a pro-communist coalition).The overwhelming majority of American Polonia was involved in unmasking false information about the Warsaw Uprising in the American press. They signed petitions to the President and Secretary of State. They collected money. They organized religious and patriotic meetings at which true information about the Warsaw Uprising was presented.
19. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 16 > Issue: 7/9
Stanisław Lem

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

political thought in times of the warsaw uprisings

20. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 16 > Issue: 7/9
Andrzej Friszke

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Political thought of the war and occupation period continued the ideological and program searches started already before 1939. The concept of democracy was mostly associated with the values such as individual freedom, civil rights, safety of citizens, society of the state; cooperation among nations in the fields of politics, economy and protection of peace. The author deals with topics like: democratic international order; democratic political order and economic system. The author concludes the article with a few synthesizing remarks.