Already a subscriber? - Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Browse by:



Displaying: 1-13 of 13 documents


1. Social Theory and Practice: Volume > 39 > Issue: 4
Erik Malmqvist

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
What, if anything, is wrong with taking advantage of people’s unjust circumstances when they both benefit from and consent to the exchange? The answer, some believe, is that such exchanges are wrongfully exploitative. I argue that this answer is incomplete at best, and I elaborate a different one: to take advantage of injustice is to become complicit in its reproduction. I also argue that the case for third-party interference with mutually beneficial and consensual exchanges, while normally considered weak, is strengthened once these exchanges are understood as implicated in broader unjust structures.

2. Social Theory and Practice: Volume > 39 > Issue: 4
Carl Knight

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Many political philosophers maintain that beneficiaries of injustice are under special obligations to assist victims of injustice. However, the examples favored by those who endorse this view equally support an alternative luck egalitarian view, which holds that special obligations should be assigned to those with good brute luck. From this perspective the distinguishing features of the benefiting view are (1) its silence on the question of whether to allocate special obligations to assist the brute luck worse off to those who are well off as a matter of brute luck but not as a result of injustice, and (2) its silence on the question of whether to allocate assistance to those who are badly off as a matter of brute luck but not as a result of injustice. In this new light, the benefiting view is harder to justify.

3. Social Theory and Practice: Volume > 39 > Issue: 4
C. M. Melenovsky

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
In his own writings, Rawls purposively used only a loose characterization of the basic structure, but two prominent misinterpretations highlight the current need for a more detailed account. First, G.A. Cohen argues that the Rawlsian focus on the basic structure is arbitrary due to the Rawlsian appeal to profound effects. Second, some theorists conflate the justification of coercion with the assessment of a basic structure by defining the basic structure as the coercive structure. Both misinterpretations can be corrected by carefully specifying what social institutions are and explaining which social institutions come together to form the basic structure of society.

4. Social Theory and Practice: Volume > 39 > Issue: 4
Steven Weimer

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Voluntarist accounts of secession are those that attempt to ground a moral right to secede in autonomy. This paper argues that no such account is likely to succeed. After describing the serious problems that plague the most straightforward Voluntarist approach, I examine two recent accounts that employ novel approaches designed to avoid those difficulties. I argue that both accounts fail, shedding considerable doubt on the possibility of a plausible autonomy-based account of the moral right to secede. I go on to discuss what this pessimistic conclusion implies for the theory and practice of secession.

5. Social Theory and Practice: Volume > 39 > Issue: 4
Mark Tunick

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Philosophers have focused on why privacy is of value to innocent people with nothing to hide. I argue that for people who do have something to hide, such as a past crime or bad behavior in a public place, informational privacy can be important for avoiding undeserved or disproportionate nonlegal punishment. Against the objection that one cannot expect privacy in public facts, I argue that I might have a legitimate privacy interest in public facts that are not readily accessible, or in details of a public fact that implicate my dignity, or in not having a public fact memorialized and spread to more people than I willingly exposed myself to.

6. Social Theory and Practice: Volume > 39 > Issue: 4
Matthew Oliver

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
In On The People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy, Philip Pettit offers a conception of freedom as non-domination that is, he claims, compromised by any regime other than democracy, yet is fully compatible with coercion by a suitably democratic state. However, as I argue, Pettit has difficulty trying to deliver the latter half of this promise. This essay offers an analysis of Pettit’s definition of freedom as non-domination, specifically, his approach to invasion and controlled interference, demonstrating that it is incapable of doing the work he wants it to do. I argue that he ought to surrender not his definition, but rather the claim that a democratic government can avoid compromising the freedom of its citizens.

book reviews

7. Social Theory and Practice: Volume > 39 > Issue: 4
Chad Kleist

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
8. Social Theory and Practice: Volume > 39 > Issue: 4
Chris Armstrong

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
9. Social Theory and Practice: Volume > 39 > Issue: 4
Paul Warren

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
10. Social Theory and Practice: Volume > 39 > Issue: 4
L. W. Sumner

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
11. Social Theory and Practice: Volume > 39 > Issue: 4
David Kaspar

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

12. Social Theory and Practice: Volume > 39 > Issue: 4

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

13. Social Theory and Practice: Volume > 39 > Issue: 4

view |  rights & permissions | cited by