PDC Homepage

Home » Products » Purchase

Studia Neoaristotelica

Volume 16, Issue 2, 2019

Davis Kuykendall
Pages 229-274

Leibniz on Spontaneity, The Eduction of Substantial Forms, and Creaturely Interaction
A Tension

Leibniz argued that (i) substantial forms only begin to exist via Divine creation; (ii) created substances cannot transeuntly cause accidents in distinct substances; and yet (iii) created substances immanently produce their accidents. Some of Leibniz’s support for (i) came from his endorsement of a widely-made argument against the eduction of substantial forms. However, in defense of eduction, Suárez argued that if creatures cannot produce substantial forms, they also cannot produce accidents, threatening the consistency of (i) and (iii). In this paper, I argue that Leibniz successfully defends the consistency of (i) and (iii) against Suárez’s argument, but at the expense of the consistency of (ii) and (iii).

Usage and Metrics