PDC Homepage

Home » Products » Purchase

Social Theory and Practice

Volume 43, Issue 4, October 2017

Elizabeth Finneron-Burns
Pages 805-823
DOI: 10.5840/soctheorpract201711123

The Intergenerational Original Position

I evaluate the mechanism Rawls uses to elicit his just savings principle. My analysis focuses on his account of membership in the original position because who is in the original position and what they know has important consequences for the rest of Rawls’s theory of intergenerational justice. I consider three options: present time of entry (PTE), actual people from various generations, and all possible people. However, I will argue that Rawls is ultimately not successful since there is no plausible composition of the original position that avoids the non-identity problem and generates acceptable moral principles without logical contradictions or inconsistencies with the rest of his theory of justice.