PDC Homepage

Home » Products » Purchase

Philo

Volume 10, Issue 1, Spring/Summer 2007

Graham Oppy
Pages 72-84
DOI: 10.5840/philo20071018

Maydole’s Modal Perfection Argument (Again)

In “On Oppy’s Objections to the Modal Perfection Argument,” Philo 8, 2, 2005, 123–30, Robert Maydole argues that his modal perfection argument—set out in his “The Modal Perfection Argument for a Supreme Being,” Philo 6, 2, 2003, 299–313—“remains arguably sound” in the face of the criticisms that I made of this argument in my “Maydole’s 2QS5 Argument,” Philo 7, 2, 2004, 203–11. I reply that Maydole is wrong: his argument is fatally flawed, and his attempts to avoid the criticisms that I have made of his argument are to no avail.

Usage and Metrics
Dimensions
PDC