PDC Homepage

Home » Products » Purchase

Res Philosophica


published on August 13, 2015

Yumiko Inukai
DOI: 10.11612/resphil.2015.92.3.4

The World of the Vulgar and the Ignorant
Hume and Nagarjuna on the Substantiality and Independence of Objects

There are remarkable parallels between Hume and Nagarjuna in their denial of substantiality and independence in objects and their subsequent attitude toward our ordinary world. Acknowledging a deep-rooted human tendency to take objects as independent entities, they both argue that there is nothing intrinsic in those objects that make them unitary and independent, and that those characters are, strictly speaking, merely fictitious, mental constructs. They nonetheless affirm the existence of our ordinary world as real. Although their main purposes of the philosophical inquiry are different (epistemological for Hume, and soteriological for Nagarjuna), their accounts of the nature of our world allow us to accept it in the way we ordinarily believe with the deeper understanding of it. It is only in this world where we think, act, and interact with others that an epistemology grounded in human sentiment and experience (for Hume) or humans liberation (for Nagarjuna) is possible.

Not yet a subscriber? Subscribe here
Already a subscriber? Login here

This document is only accessible with a subscription