PDC Homepage

Home » Products » Purchase

Res Philosophica

ONLINE FIRST

published on July 3, 2015

Dana Sarah Howard
DOI: 10.11612/resphil.2015.92.2.9

Transforming Others
On the Limits of "You'll Be Glad I Did It" Reasoning

We often find ourselves in situations in which it is up to us to make decisions on behalf of others. How can we determine whether such decisions are morally justified, especially if those decisions may change who it is these others end up becoming? In this paper, I will evaluate one plausible kind of justification that may tempt us: we may want to justify our decision by appealing to the likelihood that the other person will be glad we made that specific choice down the line. Although it is tempting, I ultimately argue that we should reject this sort of appeal as a plausible justification for the moral permissibility of our vicarious decisions. This is because the decisions that we make on behalf of another may affect the interests and values that that person will hold in the future. As I will show, this complicates the justificatory relationship between present decisions and future attitudes, since the latter can depend on the former.

Not yet a subscriber? Subscribe here
Already a subscriber? Login here

This document is only accessible with a subscription