PDC Homepage

Home » Products » Purchase

Philosophia Christi

Volume 22, Issue 2, 2020

Michael DeVito
Pages 335-345

Abduction, Imagination, and Science
An Argument against Ontological Naturalism

In this essay, I argue that developments in Alvin Plantinga’s evolutionary argument against naturalism—specifically, Thomas Crisp’s argument against a naturalistic metaphysics—have likely undermined the project of science for naturalists who are scientific realists. Scientific theorizing requires the use of abductive reasoning. A central component of abductive reasoning is the use of one’s imagination. However, Crisp’s argument provides us reason to doubt the trustworthiness of our cognitive faculties as it relates to the imaginative abilities necessary for complex abductive reasoning.

Usage and Metrics