PDC Homepage

Home » Products » Purchase

Logos & Episteme

Volume 10, Issue 4, 2019

Seungbae Park
Pages 379-393

Surrealism Is Not an Alternative to Scientific Realism

Surrealism holds that observables behave as if T were true, whereas scientific realism holds that T is true. Surrealism and scientific realism give different explanations of why T is empirically adequate. According to surrealism, T is empirically adequate because observables behave as if it were true. According to scientific realism, T is empirically adequate because it is true. I argue that the surrealist explanation merely clarifies the concept of empirical adequacy, whereas the realist explanation makes an inductive inference about T. Therefore, the surrealist explanation is a conceptual one, whereas the realist explanation is an empirical one, and the former is not an alternative to the latter.

Usage and Metrics
Dimensions
PDC