PDC Homepage

Home » Products » Purchase

Faith and Philosophy

Volume 26, Issue 3, July 2009

Katherin Rogers
Pages 320-338
DOI: 10.5840/faithphil200926317

Back to Eternalism
A Response to Leftow’s “Anselmian Presentism”

Against my interpretation, Brian Leftow argues that Anselm of Canterbury held a presentist theory of time, and that presentism can be reconciled with Anselm’s commitments concerning divine omnipotence and omniscience. I respond, focusing mainly on two issues. First, it is difficult to understand the presentist theory which Leftow attributes to Anselm. I articulate my puzzlement in a way that I hope moves the discussion forward. Second, Leftow’s examples to demonstrate that presentism can be reconciled with Anselm’s understanding of the divine nature assume a mode of divine knowing which is different from what Anselm proposes. I stand by my interpretation.