Cover of Philosophical Topics
back

Philosophical Topics

Volume 13, Issue 1, Fall 1982

Realism

Ian Hacking
Pages 71-87

Experimentation and Scientific Realism

Cited by

  • Calvin Smith. Methods and Paradigms in Education Research 2017: 124. [CrossRef]
  • Catherine Elizabeth Kendig. Science and Engineering Ethics. What is Proof of Concept Research and how does it Generate Epistemic and Ethical Categories for Future Scientific Practice? 2016. [CrossRef]
  • Anjan Chakravartty. Philosophical Studies. What you don’t know can’t hurt you: realism and the unconceived 2008. [CrossRef]
  • William G. Lycan. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Explanationism, ECHO, and the connectionist paradigm 1989. [CrossRef]
  • John Knight. Australian Journal of Education. Creation-Science, Evolution-Science, and Education: Anything Goes? 1985. [CrossRef]
  • Meeting the Universe Halfway 2006: 3. [CrossRef]
  • Catherine Z. Elgin. Perspectives on Science. Fiction as Thought Experiment 2014. [CrossRef]
  • Wolfgang Stegmüller. Theorie und Erfahrung 1986: 311. [CrossRef]
  • Hee‐Sun Lee, Gey‐Hong Gweon, Aubree Webb, Dan Damelin, Chad Dorsey. Science Education. Measuring epistemic knowledge development related to scientific experimentation practice: A construct modeling approach 2024. [CrossRef]
  • Meeting the Universe Halfway 2006: 189. [CrossRef]
  • Stephen J. Read, Lynn C. Miller. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Explanatory coherence in understanding persons, interactions, and relationships 1989. [CrossRef]
  • Carl Bereiter, Marlene Scardamalia. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. When weak explanations prevail 1989. [CrossRef]
  • María Laura Martínez Rodríguez. Texture in the Work of Ian Hacking 2021: 135. [CrossRef]
  • Herbert A. Simon. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. ECHO and STAHL: On the theory of combustion 1989. [CrossRef]
  • Fred Fonseca, Michael Marcinkowski, Clodoveu Davis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Cyber‐human systems of thought and understanding 2019. [CrossRef]
  • John R. Josephson. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Inference to the best explanation is basic 1989. [CrossRef]
  • Meeting the Universe Halfway 2006: 223. [CrossRef]
  • Paul B. Thompson. Ethics, Policy & Environment. From Synthetic Bioethics to One Bioethics: A Reply to Critics 2015. [CrossRef]
  • Jarrett Leplin. Philosophy of Science. Methodological Realism and Scientific Rationality 1986. [CrossRef]
  • William H. Krieger, Brian L. Keeley. Paul Churchland 2005: 175. [CrossRef]
  • Christopher Ansell. Public Performance & Management Review. Coping with Conceptual Pluralism: Reflections on Concept Formation 2021. [CrossRef]
  • K. Brad Wray. Synthese. The pessimistic induction and the exponential growth of science reassessed 2013. [CrossRef]
  • Galina Weinstein. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. Coincidence and reproducibility in the EHT black hole experiment 2021. [CrossRef]
  • Katie Robertson, Alastair Wilson. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. Theoretical Relicts: Progress, Reduction, and Autonomy 2023. [CrossRef]
  • JOHN EARMAN, JOHN T. ROBERTS. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Contact with the Nomic: A Challenge for Deniers of Humean Supervenience about Laws of Nature Part II: the Epistemological Argument for Humean Supervenience 2005. [CrossRef]
  • Derek Lam. Synthese. Being pessimistic about the objective present 2021. [CrossRef]
  • Drew McDermott. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Optimization and connectionism are two different things 1989. [CrossRef]
  • Gareth Gabrys, Alan Lesgold. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Coherence: Beyond constraint satisfaction 1989. [CrossRef]
  • Bruce Mangan, Stephen Palmer. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. New science for olds 1989. [CrossRef]
  • Peter Galbács. The Friedman-Lucas Transition in Macroeconomics 2020: 1. [CrossRef]
  • Félix Flores Pinheiro. Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia. CRENÇA, VERDADE E EXATIDÃO: O REALISMO CIENTÍFICO ENCONTRA A FILOSOFIA DAS MEDIÇÕES* 2022. [CrossRef]
  • Wendy Ross, Vlad Glăveanu. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. The constraints of habit: craft, repetition, and creativity 2023. [CrossRef]
  • Gregory M. Mikkelson. Biology & Philosophy. Complexity and Verisimilitude: Realism for Ecology 2001. [CrossRef]
  • Jennifer Lin. SSRN Electronic Journal. Active Eating: Spinozist Ontology and the Practice of Self-Discipline 2010. [CrossRef]
  • Roderic Crooks. Educational Media International. Representationalism at work: dashboards and data analytics in urban education 2017. [CrossRef]
  • Niccolò Negro. Neuroscience of Consciousness. (Dis)confirming theories of consciousness and their predictions: towards a Lakatosian consciousness science 2024. [CrossRef]
  • Sandy C. Boucher, Curtis Forbes. Synthese. The pragmatic turn in the scientific realism debate 2024. [CrossRef]
  • Meeting the Universe Halfway 2006: 247. [CrossRef]
  • Antonio Vassallo, Pedro Naranjo, Tim Koslowski. Synthese. A proposal for a metaphysics of self-subsisting structures. I. Classical physics 2022. [CrossRef]
  • Michael Marcinkowski, Fred Fonseca. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. The conditions of peak empiricism in big data and interaction design 2016. [CrossRef]
  • Thomas Pradeu. Les limites du soi 2010: 341. [CrossRef]
  • Jacob Busch. Synthese. Can the new indispensability argument be saved from Euclidean rescues? 2012. [CrossRef]
  • Michael Strevens. Metascience. Explanation and reality: comment on Chakravartty 2018. [CrossRef]
  • Michelene T. H. Chi. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Assimilating evidence: The key to revision? 1989. [CrossRef]
  • Martin Eisend, Alfred Kuß. Grundlagen empirischer Forschung 2021: 129. [CrossRef]
  • Peter Galbács. The Friedman-Lucas Transition in Macroeconomics 2020: 163. [CrossRef]
  • David Papineau. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Probability and normativity 1989. [CrossRef]
  • Rosa Cao. Synthese. Putting representations to use 2022. [CrossRef]
  • Michela Massimi. Philosophy of Science. Perspectival Modeling 2018. [CrossRef]
  • N. E. Wetherick. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Psychology, or sociology of science? 1989. [CrossRef]
  • Martin Eisend, Alfred Kuss. Research Methodology in Marketing 2019: 83. [CrossRef]
  • Markus I. Eronen. Synthese. Robustness and reality 2015. [CrossRef]
  • Karen Barad. Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science 1996: 161. [CrossRef]
  • Oliver M. Lean, Luca Rivelli, Charles H. Pence. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. Digital Literature Analysis for Empirical Philosophy of Science 2023. [CrossRef]
  • Michael P. Wolf. Acta Analytica. Reference and Incommensurability: What Rigid Designation Won’t Get You 2007. [CrossRef]
  • Mark Pexton. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. Emergence and interacting hierarchies in shock physics 2016. [CrossRef]
  • Meeting the Universe Halfway 2006: 97. [CrossRef]
  • Raphaël Künstler. Journal for General Philosophy of Science. The Anti-Metaphysical Argument Against Scientific Realism: A Minimally Metaphysical Response 2021. [CrossRef]
  • Lu Chen. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Can we “effectivize” spacetime? 2022. [CrossRef]
  • Calvin Smith. Emerging Methods and Paradigms in Scholarship and Education Research 2020: 96. [CrossRef]
  • Jerry R. Hobbs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Are explanatory coherence and a connectionist model necessary? 1989. [CrossRef]
  • Peter Achinstein. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Explanation and acceptability 1989. [CrossRef]
  • Meeting the Universe Halfway 2006: 353. [CrossRef]
  • Meeting the Universe Halfway 2006: 132. [CrossRef]
  • WILLIAM G. LYCAN. The Southern Journal of Philosophy. EXPLANATIONIST REBUTTALS (COHERENTISM DEFENDED AGAIN) 2012. [CrossRef]
  • Mahdi Khalili. Philosophy of Science. A Dialogue among Recent Views of Entity Realism 2023. [CrossRef]
  • Brendan Cline. Philosophical Studies. Against deliberative indispensability as an independent guide to what there is 2016. [CrossRef]
  • James A. Reggia. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Measuring the plausibility of explanatory hypotheses 1989. [CrossRef]
  • Joshua Klayman, Robin M. Hogarth. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Does ECHO explain explanation? A psychological perspective 1989. [CrossRef]
  • P. C.-H. Cheng, M. Keane. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Explanatory coherence as a psychological theory 1989. [CrossRef]
  • Martin Eisend, Alfred Kuß. Grundlagen empirischer Forschung 2023: 143. [CrossRef]
  • Ronald N. Giere. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. What does explanatory coherence explain? 1989. [CrossRef]
  • L. Jonathan Cohen. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Two problems for the explanatory coherence theory of acceptability 1989. [CrossRef]
  • Matti Tedre, John Pajunen. ACM Transactions on Computing Education. Grand Theories or Design Guidelines? Perspectives on the Role of Theory in Computing Education Research 2023. [CrossRef]
  • Bruce L. Rhoads. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. On being a ‘real’ geomorphologist 1994. [CrossRef]
  • Wolfgang Stegmüller. Realismus und Strukturalismus. Anwendungen: Literaturtheorie. Tauschwirtschaft. Entscheidungstheorie. Neurosentheorie. Kapital- und Mehrwerttheorie 1986: 311. [CrossRef]
  • Meeting the Universe Halfway 2006: 39. [CrossRef]
  • Meeting the Universe Halfway 2006: 405. [CrossRef]
  • Fred Fonseca. AI & SOCIETY. Data objects for knowing 2022. [CrossRef]
  • Pierre Cruse. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. Ramsey sentences, structural realism and trivial realization 2005. [CrossRef]
  • Jan M. Zytkow. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Texting ECHO on historical data 1989. [CrossRef]
  • Daniel S. Levine. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Explanatory coherence in neural networks? 1989. [CrossRef]
  • Margaret Morrison. Synthese. Theory, intervention and realism 1990. [CrossRef]
  • Meeting the Universe Halfway 2006: 477. [CrossRef]
  • John D. Hathcoat, Cara Meixner. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. Pragmatism, Factor Analysis, and the Conditional Incompatibility Thesis in Mixed Methods Research 2017. [CrossRef]
  • Douglas M. Long. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science. Pragmatism, realism, and psychology: Understanding theory selection criteria 2013. [CrossRef]
  • Vera Matarese, Siska De Baerdemaeker, Nora Mills Boyd. Philosophy of Astrophysics 2023: 1. [CrossRef]
  • Douglas M. Long, Brandon T. Sanford. The Wiley Handbook of Contextual Behavioral Science 2015: 81. [CrossRef]
  • Trevor Hussey. Nursing Philosophy. Realism and nursing 2000. [CrossRef]
  • Ram Neta. Philosophical Issues. Skepticism, Abductivism, and the Explanatory Gap 2004. [CrossRef]
  • Charles Pavitt. Communication Monographs. Theory–data interaction from the standpoint of scientific realism: a reaction to bostrom 2004. [CrossRef]
  • The Judicial Assessment of Expert Evidence 2008: 133. [CrossRef]
  • Markus I. Eronen. Synthese. Robust realism for the life sciences 2019. [CrossRef]
  • Ian Hacking. Foundations of Science. Scientific realism about some chemical entities 1995. [CrossRef]
  • Juha Saatsi. Philosophers Look at Quantum Mechanics 2019: 141. [CrossRef]
  • Bruce Long. Axiomathes. A Scientific Metaphysics and Ockham’s Razor 2019. [CrossRef]
  • D. C. Earle. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. On the testability of ECHO 1989. [CrossRef]
  • Robyn M. Dawes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Thagard's Principle 7 and Simpson's paradox 1989. [CrossRef]
  • Bence Nanay. Synthese. Entity realism and singularist semirealism 2019. [CrossRef]
  • Meeting the Universe Halfway 2006: 71. [CrossRef]
  • Samuel Schindler. Philosophy of Science. Theoretical Virtues: Do Scientists Think What Philosophers Think They Ought to Think? 2022. [CrossRef]
  • John D. Norton. After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend 2000: 67. [CrossRef]
  • Matti Sintonen. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Theory autonomy and future promise 1989. [CrossRef]
  • Paul Thagard. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Explanatory coherence 1989. [CrossRef]
  • Paul Thagard. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Extending explanatory coherence 1989. [CrossRef]
  • Jerome A. Feldman. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. What's in a link? 1989. [CrossRef]
  • Paul O'Rorke. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Coherence and abduction 1989. [Cros sRef]
  • Matthew J. Brown. Metaphilosophy. The Functional Complexity of Scientific Evidence 2015. [CrossRef]
  • Thor Grünbaum. Synthese. The two visual systems hypothesis and contrastive underdetermination 2021. [CrossRef]
  • Robert N. McCauley. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Acceptability, analogy, and the acceptability of analogies 1989. [CrossRef]
  • Jochen Runde, Mark de Rond. Organization Studies. Evaluating Causal Explanations of Specific Events 2010. [CrossRef]
There may be additional citations on Google Scholar.