Philosophical Inquiry

Volume 30, Issue 1/2, Spring 2008

In Honour of Nikos Avgelis

Stathis Psillos
Pages 135-156

Carnap and Incommensurability

Cited by

  • Michał Kokowski. Studia Historiae Scientiarum. A Critical Comment on T.S. Kuhn’s Views about the So-called Copernican Revolution and Several Current Prejudices – Barriers in Scientific Communities 2023. [CrossRef]
  • Mikaël Cozic, Brian Hill. Journal of Economic Methodology. Representation theorems and the semantics of decision-theoretic concepts 2015. [CrossRef]
  • Sciences et décision 2015: 127. [CrossRef]
  • Stathis Psillos. Current Trends in Philosophy of Science 2022: 261. [CrossRef]
  • Stathis Psillos. Perception, Realism, and the Problem of Reference 2012: 212. [CrossRef]
  • Gilson Olegario da Silva. Manuscrito. Carnap and Kuhn on linguistic frameworks and scientific revolutions 2013. [CrossRef]
  • Jonathan Surovell. Synthese. Empirical significance, predictive power, and explication 2019. [CrossRef]
There may be additional citations on Google Scholar.