Midwest Studies in Philosophy

Volume 37, 2013

The New Atheism and Its Critics

Massimo Pigliucci
Pages 142-153

New Atheism and the Scientistic Turn in the Atheism Movement

Cited by

  • Renia Gasparatou. Science & Education. Scientism and Scientific Thinking 2017. [CrossRef]
  • Eric Steinhart. Believing in Dawkins 2020: 119. [CrossRef]
  • Ruben Sanchez-Sabate. Religions. Contemporary Grammars of Meaning Creation: Scientific Creationism and New Atheism 2021. [CrossRef]
  • Christopher R. Cotter. New Atheism: Critical Perspectives and Contemporary Debates 2017: 33. [CrossRef]
  • Lluis Oviedo, Lorenzo Magarelli, Piotr Roszak, Josefa Torralba Albaladej, Berenika Seryczyńska, Valentina Baldas, Jan Wółkowski. British Journal of Religious Education. Perceptions of science, religion and spirituality in high school students: an empirical approach 2024. [CrossRef]
  • Wild Experiment 2022: 243. [CrossRef]
  • Mario Kötter, Marcus Hammann. Science & Education. Controversy as a Blind Spot in Teaching Nature of Science 2017. [CrossRef]
  • Wild Experiment 2022: 80. [CrossRef]
  • Maryam Dilmaghani. Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses. Who is Not Afraid of Richard Dawkins? Using Google Trends to Assess the Reach of Influential Atheists across Canadian Secular Groups 2020. [CrossRef]
  • Peter Admirand. Interreligious Studies and Intercultural Theology. Atheist Critiques of the New Atheists 2020. [CrossRef]
  • Mikael Stenmark. Religions. Religion and Its Public Critics 2022. [CrossRef]
  • Mark Brockway. Politics and Religion. Home on Sunday, Home on Tuesday? Secular Political Participation in the United States 2018. [CrossRef]
  • Wild Experiment 2022: 137. [CrossRef]
  • Tatjana Schnell. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion. Dimensions of Secularity (DoS): An Open Inventory to Measure Facets of Secular Identities 2015. [CrossRef]
  • Edward Guimont, Megan Baumhammer. Endeavour. Public history, personal pseudohistory, and VirtHSTM 2022. [CrossRef]
  • Wild Experiment 2022: 200. [CrossRef]
  • Melanie Elyse Brewster, Wei Motulsky, Andy Chan. The Cambridge History of Atheism 2021: 1059. [CrossRef]
  • Łukasz Jach. Current Issues in Personality Psychology. The scientistic worldview and its relationships with fear of COVID, conspiracy beliefs, preventive behaviors, and attitudes towards vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic in a Polish sample 2022. [CrossRef]
  • Wild Experiment 2022: 281. [CrossRef]
  • Wild Experiment 2022: 230. [CrossRef]
  • Wild Experiment 2022: 33. [CrossRef]
  • Wild Experiment 2022: 107. [CrossRef]
  • Wild Experiment 2022: 169. [CrossRef]
  • Michael Ruse. The Cambridge History of Atheism 2021. [CrossRef]
  • Maryam Dilmaghani. Review of Social Economy. The evolution of the gender religiosity gap among the Canadian-born 2019. [CrossRef]
  • Wild Experiment 2022: 1. [CrossRef]
  • Brian D. Earp. Think. SCIENCE CANNOT DETERMINE HUMAN VALUES 2016. [CrossRef]
  • Renia Gasparatou. Cultural Studies of Science Education. Understanding the sciences: a quasi-Wittgensteinian note on NOS 2019. [CrossRef]
  • Wild Experiment 2022: 57. [CrossRef]
  • Re‐Imagining Nature: The Promise of a Christian Natural Theology 2016: 184. [CrossRef]
  • Whitley Kaufman. Philosophy Compass. New Atheism and its critics 2019. [CrossRef]
  • Inga Jasinskaja‐Lahti, Jolanda Jetten. British Journal of Social Psychology. Unpacking the relationship between religiosity and conspiracy beliefs in Australia 2019. [CrossRef]
  • Christopher R. Mayes, Donald B. Thompson. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry. What Should We Eat? Biopolitics, Ethics, and Nutritional Scientism 2015. [CrossRef]
  • Petar Lukić, Iris Žeželj. Public Understanding of Science. Delineating between scientism and science enthusiasm: Challenges in measuring scientism and the development of novel scale 2023. [CrossRef]
  • James Dalziel. Innovating Christian Education Research 2021: 173. [CrossRef]
  • Rik Peels. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. Scientism and scientific fundamentalism: what science can learn from mainstream religion 2023. [CrossRef]
There may be additional citations on Google Scholar.