The Monist

Volume 93, Issue 4, October 2010

Philosophical History of Science

George E. Smith
Pages 545-579

Revisiting Accepted Science
The Indispensability of the History of Science

Cited by

  • Nick Huggett, George E. Smith, David Marshall Miller, William Harper. Metascience. On Newton’s method 2013. [CrossRef]
  • Nadine de Courtenay. Perspectives on Science. On the Philosophical Significance of the Reform of the International System of Units (SI): A Double-Adjustment Account of Scientific Enquiry 2022. [CrossRef]
  • George Borg. Perspectives on Science. Discovery and Instrumentation: How Surplus Knowledge Contributes to Progress in Science 2019. [CrossRef]
  • William L. Harper, Kent W. Staley, Henk W. de Regt, Peter Achinstein. Metascience. Objective evidence and rules of strategy: Achinstein on method 2014. [CrossRef]
  • David Rabouin. Cultures without Culturalism 2017: 196. [CrossRef]
  • Adam Koberinski, Bridget Falck, Chris Smeenk. Universe. Contemporary Philosophical Perspectives on the Cosmological Constant 2023. [CrossRef]
  • Jody Azzouni. Theory, Evidence, Data: Themes from George E. Smith 2023: 1. [CrossRef]
  • Isis. Current Bibliography of the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences, 2012 2012. [CrossRef]
  • Fabien Grégis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. Assessing accuracy in measurement: The dilemma of safety versus precision in the adjustment of the fundamental physical constants 2019. [CrossRef]
  • Michael N. Keas. Synthese. Systematizing the theoretical virtues 2018. [CrossRef]
There may be additional citations on Google Scholar.