Volume 89, Issue 1, January 2006
Truth
Roy T. Cook
Pages 118-149
There Are Non-circular Paradoxes (But Yablo’s Isn't One of Them!)
Cited by
- LAVINIA PICOLLO. The Review of Symbolic Logic. REFERENCE IN ARITHMETIC 2018. [CrossRef]
- Ming Hsiung. Journal of Logic, Language and Information. Equiparadoxicality of Yablo’s Paradox and the Liar 2013. [CrossRef]
- David Ripley. Analysis. The Yablo Paradox: An Essay on Circularity By Roy T. Cook 2015. [CrossRef]
- Philip Kremer. Journal of Philosophical Logic. How Truth Behaves When There’s No Vicious Reference 2010. [CrossRef]
- Miroslav Hanke. Res Philosophica. Semantic Paradox: A Comparative Analysis of Scholastic and Analytic Views 2014. [CrossRef]
- Lavinia Picollo. Journal of Philosophical Logic. Reference and Truth 2020. [CrossRef]
- Roy T. Cook. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. The No-No Paradox Is a Paradox 2011. [CrossRef]
- LORENZO ROSSI. The Review of Symbolic Logic. A UNIFIED THEORY OF TRUTH AND PARADOX 2019. [CrossRef]
- Lavinia María Picollo. Studia Logica. Yablo’s Paradox in Second-Order Languages: Consistency and Unsatisfiability 2013. [CrossRef]
- Landon Rabern, Brian Rabern, Matthew Macauley. Journal of Philosophical Logic. Dangerous Reference Graphs and Semantic Paradoxes 2013. [CrossRef]
- Lavinia Picollo. Journal of Philosophical Logic. Alethic Reference 2020. [CrossRef]
- Shunsuke Yatabe. New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 2011: 90. [CrossRef]
- R. T. Cook. Analysis. Curry, Yablo and duality 2009. [CrossRef]
- Sjur Dyrkolbotn, Michał Walicki. Synthese. Propositional discourse logic 2014. [CrossRef]