The Monist

Volume 87, Issue 3, July 2004

Simples

Peter Forrest
Pages 351-370

Grit or Gunk
Implications of the Banach-Tarski Paradox

Cited by

  • Daniel Nolan. Noûs. Space, time and parsimony 2023. [CrossRef]
  • Travis Dumsday. Synthese. MaxCon extended simples and the dispositionalist ontology of laws 2017. [CrossRef]
  • Aaron Segal. Philosophical Perspectives. A Puzzle About Points 2016. [CrossRef]
  • Travis Dumsday. Philosophia. Atoms vs. Extended Simples: Towards a Dispositionalist Reconciliation 2015. [CrossRef]
  • Travis Dumsday. Dispositionalism and the Metaphysics of Science 2019. [CrossRef]
  • Peter Forrest. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. Nonclassical Mereology and Its Application to Sets 2002. [CrossRef]
  • James Franklin. An Aristotelian Realist Philosophy of Mathematics 2014: 141. [CrossRef]
  • Lu Chen. Synthese. Do simple infinitesimal parts solve Zeno’s paradox of measure? 2021. [CrossRef]
  • Hud Hudson. Philosophy Compass. Simples and Gunk 2007. [CrossRef]
  • David Builes, Trevor Teitel. Philosophical Studies. A puzzle about rates of change 2020. [CrossRef]
  • David Builes, Jessica M. Wilson. Philosophical Studies. In defense of Countabilism 2022. [CrossRef]
  • N. Effingham. Synthese. An unwelcome consequence of the Multiverse Thesis 2012. [CrossRef]
There may be additional citations on Google Scholar.