Volume 77, Issue 1, January 1994
The Ontology of Scientific Realism
Peter Forrest
Pages 47-70
Why Most of Us Should Be Scientific Realists
A Reply to Van Fraassen
Cited by
- Darrell P. Rowbottom. Synthese. Scientific realism: what it is, the contemporary debate, and new directions 2019. [CrossRef]
- James Ladyman, Igor Douven, Leon Horsten, Bas Fraassen. The Philosophical Quarterly. A Defence of van Fraassen's Critique of Abductive Inference: Reply to Psillos 1997. [CrossRef]
- Mario Caro De, Dominika Dzwonkowska. Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae. Filozoficzny realizm między naturą a zdrowym rozsądkiem, część I 2017. [CrossRef]
- Bradley Monton, Bas C. van Fraassen. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. Constructive Empiricism and Modal Nominalism 2003. [CrossRef]
- Tomasz Wysocki. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. The delusive benefit of the doubt 2023. [CrossRef]
- Seungbae Park. Acta Analytica. The Uniformity Principle vs. the Disuniformity Principle 2017. [CrossRef]
- James R. Beebe, Finnur Dellsén. Philosophy of Science. Scientific Realism in the Wild: An Empirical Study of Seven Sciences and History and Philosophy of Science 2020. [CrossRef]
- James Ladyman. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. What is structural realism? 1998. [CrossRef]
- Park Sun Hyung. Educational Management & Administration. Australian Naturalism and its Critics 1997. [CrossRef]
- M. De Caro. The Monist. Realism, Common Sense, and Science 2015. [CrossRef]