The Monist

Volume 60, Issue 2, April 1977

Philosophy and Religion in the 19th Century

Michael Ruse
Pages 244-268

William Whewell and The Argument from Design

Cited by

  • Menachem Fisch. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. Necessary and contingent truth in William Whewell's antithetical theory of knowledge 1985. [CrossRef]
  • John Losee. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. Whewell and Mill on the relation between philosophy of science and history of science 1983. [CrossRef]
  • Michael Ruse. Philosophy of Science. Karl Popper's Philosophy of Biology 1977. [CrossRef]
  • Alister E. McGrath. Zygon®. RESPONSE: SCIENCE AND RELIGION—THE STATE OF THE ART 2022. [CrossRef]
  • Michael Ruse. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. Teleology: yesterday, today, and tomorrow? 2000. [CrossRef]
  • Laura J. Snyder. Handbook of the History of Logic - British Logic in the Nineteenth Century 2008: 163. [CrossRef]
  • Ilkka Niiniluoto. Is Science Progressive? 1984: 18. [CrossRef]
  • Michael Ruse. Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy . Darwin and Design 2022. [CrossRef]
  • Laura J. Snyder. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. It's all necessarily so: William Whewell on scientific truth 1994. [CrossRef]
  • M. R.. Biology & Philosophy. Booknotes 1994. [CrossRef]
There may be additional citations on Google Scholar.