The Monist

Volume 60, Issue 2, April 1977

Philosophy and Religion in the 19th Century

Robert Merrihew Adams
Pages 228-243

Kierkegaard’s Arguments Against Objective Reasoning In Religion

Cited by

  • Kris McDaniel. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Teleological Suspensions In Fear and Trembling 2020. [CrossRef]
  • Eduardus Lemanto. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. Fundamentalism: a Religious Cognitive Bias? A Philosophical Discourse of Religious Fundamentalism 2023. [CrossRef]
  • Antony Aumann. History of European Ideas. Kierkegaard on the transformative power of art 2021. [CrossRef]
  • Lara Buchak. Contemporary Epistemology 2019: 110. [CrossRef]
  • Katherine Dormandy. Australasian Philosophical Review. True Faith: Against Doxastic Partiality about Faith (in God and Religious Communities) and in Defence of Evidentialism 2021. [CrossRef]
  • Bilge SALUR, Fırat ÇELEBİ. Hitit İlahiyat Dergisi. Kierkegaard’ın İman Anlayışında Meister Eckhart Düşüncesinin Etkisi 2022. [CrossRef]
  • Lara Buchak. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Faith and rational deference to authority 2024. [CrossRef]
  • Z Quanbeck. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Resolving to believe: Kierkegaard's direct doxastic voluntarism 2024. [CrossRef]
  • Z Quanbeck. European Journal of Philosophy. Kierkegaard on belief and credence 2024. [CrossRef]
  • Z Quanbeck. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. Kierkegaard on the Relationship Between Practical and Epistemic Reasons for Belief 2024. [CrossRef]
  • Katherine Dormandy. Australasian Philosophical Review. The Doxastic Norms of Faith: Reply to Commentators 2021. [CrossRef]
There may be additional citations on Google Scholar.