The Monist

Volume 55, Issue 3, July 1971

British Philosophy in the 19th Century

Gerd Buchdahl
Pages 343-367

Inductivist Versus Deductivist Approaches in the Philosophy of Science as Illustrated by Some Controversies Between Whewell and Mill

Cited by

  • Raphael Scholl. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. Unwarranted assumptions: Claude Bernard and the growth of the vera causa standard 2020. [CrossRef]
  • Raphaël Sandoz. Synthese. Applying mathematics to empirical sciences: flashback to a puzzling disciplinary interaction 2018. [CrossRef]
  • Cornelis Menke. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. The Whewell-Mill debate on predictions, from Mill's point of view 2018. [CrossRef]
  • Andrew Lugg. An Intimate Relation 1989: 283. [CrossRef]
  • Menachem Fisch. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. Necessary and contingent truth in William Whewell's antithetical theory of knowledge 1985. [CrossRef]
  • Ulrich Charpa. Philosophische Wissenschaftshistorie 1995: 64. [CrossRef]
  • Geoffrey Scarre. A Companion to the Philosophy of Science 2017: 293. [CrossRef]
  • Raphaël Sandoz. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. Whewell on the classification of the sciences 2016. [CrossRef]
  • John Losee. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. Whewell and Mill on the relation between philosophy of science and history of science 1983. [CrossRef]
  • Plamena Panayotova. Sociology and Statistics in Britain, 1833–1979 2020: 67. [CrossRef]
  • Aaron D. Cobb. A Companion to Mill 2016: 234. [CrossRef]
  • Aleta Quinn. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. William Whewell’s philosophy of architecture and the historicization of biology 2016. [CrossRef]
  • Ulrich Charpa. Darwinism, Philosophy, and Experimental Biology 2010: 7. [CrossRef]
  • John Stuart Mill on Economic Theory and Method 2000. [CrossRef]
  • Nick Jardine. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. Hermeneutic strategies in Gerd Buchdahl’s Kantian philosophy of science 2003. [CrossRef]
  • Enzo Campelli. SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE. «So much the worse for logic»: Notes on William Whewell's methodology 2016. [CrossRef]
  • Samuel Hollander. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. William Whewell and John Stuart Mill on the methodology of political economy 1983. [CrossRef]
  • Michael Ruse. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. Darwin's debt to philosophy: An examination of the influence of the philosophical ideas of John F.W. Herschel and William Whewell on the development of Charles Darwin's theory of evolution 1975. [CrossRef]
  • John Wettersten. Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Rethinking Whewell 1993. [CrossRef]
  • John Stuart Mill on Economic Theory and Method 2000: 78. [CrossRef]
  • Jack Morrell. History of Science. Essay Review: The Judge and Purifier of All, William Whewell: Philosopher of Science, William Whewell: A Composite Portrait 1992. [CrossRef]
  • Ragnar van der Merwe. Journal for General Philosophy of Science. Whewell’s Hylomorphism as a Metaphorical Explanation for How Mind and World Merge 2023. [CrossRef]
  • Roger Smith. History of Science. The Background of Physiological Psychology in Natural Philosophy 1973. [CrossRef]
  • Ulrich Charpa. Journal for General Philosophy of Science. Darwin, Schleiden, Whewell, and the “London Doctors”: Evolutionism and Microscopical Research in the Nineteenth Century 2010. [CrossRef]
There may be additional citations on Google Scholar.