The Leibniz Review

Volume 21, December 2011

Richard T. W. Arthur
Pages 91-115

Presupposition, Aggregation, and Leibniz’s Argument for a Plurality of Substances

Cited by

  • Adam Harmer. British Journal for the History of Philosophy. Leibniz on Infinite Numbers, Infinite Wholes, and Composite Substances 2014. [CrossRef]
  • Adam Harmer. Res Philosophica. The Role of Plurality in Leibniz's Argument from Unity 2020. [CrossRef]
  • Richard T. W. Arthur. Infinity in Early Modern Philosophy 2018: 155. [CrossRef]
  • Richard T. W. Arthur. Leibniz’s Metaphysics and Adoption of Substantial Forms 2015: 143. [CrossRef]
  • Mehmet Tabak. The Doctrine of Being in Hegel’s Science of Logic 2017: 101. [CrossRef]
  • Adam Harmer. Res Philosophica. Mereological Nihilism and Simple Substance in Leibniz 2022. [CrossRef]
  • Stephen Puryear. The Philosophical Quarterly. The Logic of Leibniz’s Borrowed Reality Argument 2020. [CrossRef]
  • Richard T. W. Arthur. G.W. Leibniz, Interrelations between Mathematics and Philosophy 2015: 137. [CrossRef]
  • Adam Harmer. Res Philosophica. Leibniz on Plurality, Dependence, and Unity 2018. [CrossRef]
There may be additional citations on Google Scholar.