Volume 17, December 2007
Mogens Lærke
Pages 1-30
Quod non omnia possibilia ad existentiam perveniant
Leibniz’s ontology of possibility, 1668-1678
Cited by
- Eric Stencil. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. Essence and Possibility in the Leibniz‐Arnauld Correspondence 2016. [CrossRef]
- Gastón Robert. British Journal for the History of Philosophy. Panentheistic, monistic, non-necessitarian: Leibniz’s view of the relation between God and nature in 1675–1676 2023. [CrossRef]
- Kimberly Brewer. Kantian Review. Alternate Possibilities, Divine Omniscience and Critique of Judgement §76 2021. [CrossRef]
- Yual Chiek. Leibniz on Compossibility and Possible Worlds 2016: 91. [CrossRef]
- Marine Picon. Intellectual History Review. “The summulists’ disputesde constantia subjecti”: The young Leibniz and his teachers on eternal truths and existence 2014. [CrossRef]
- MAXIME BOUTROS-JACQUELINE. Dialogue. Nécessitarisme leibnizien et volonté divine à l’époque duDe summa rerum: un choix du meilleur sans alternatives? 2017. [CrossRef]