Journal of Philosophical Research

Volume 27, 2002

Michael Huemer
Pages 329-340

Fumerton’s Principle of Inferential Justification

Cited by

  • Adam Leite. Synthese. Believing one’s reasons are good 2008. [CrossRef]
  • Richard Fumerton. Philosophical Issues. Epistemic Probability1 2004. [CrossRef]
  • Chris Tucker. Synthese. On what inferentially justifies what: the vices of reliabilism and proper functionalism 2014. [CrossRef]
  • Anna‐Sara Malmgren. Philosophical Issues. VARIETIES OF INFERENCE? 2018. [CrossRef]
  • Anna-Sara Malmgren. Synthese. Goodness, availability, and argument structure 2021. [CrossRef]
  • Jonathan Vogel, Richard Fumerton. Contemporary Debates in Epistemology 2013: 107. [CrossRef]
  • Richard Fumerton. Episteme. WHAT THE INTERNALIST SHOULD SAY TO THE TORTOISE 2015. [CrossRef]
  • Chris Tucker. Philosophical Studies. Movin’ on up: higher-level requirements and inferential justification 2012. [CrossRef]
  • Magdalena Balcerak Jackson. Synthese. Conceptual Analysis and Epistemic Progress 2013. [CrossRef]
  • Michael Huemer. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. There Is No Pure Empirical Reasoning 2017. [CrossRef]
  • Wolfgang Barz. Theoria. Introspection as a Game of Make‐Believe 2014. [CrossRef]
  • Richard Fumerton. Foundationalism 2022. [CrossRef]
There may be additional citations on Google Scholar.