Volume 110, Issue 8, August 2013
Douglas W. Portmore
Pages 436-459
Perform Your Best Option
Cited by
- Daniel Immerman. Philosophical Studies. How should we accommodate our future misbehavior? The answer turns on how bad it will be 2020. [CrossRef]
- DOUGLAS W. PORTMORE. Utilitas. Transitivity, Moral Latitude, and Supererogation 2017. [CrossRef]
- Alex Horne. Synthese. Too many cooks 2022. [CrossRef]
- Travis Timmerman, Yishai Cohen. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. Moral Obligations: Actualist, Possibilist, or Hybridist? 2016. [CrossRef]
- Douglas W. Portmore. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Maximalism and Moral Harmony 2018. [CrossRef]
- Daniel Immerman. The Philosophical Quarterly. Does Ought Imply Ought Ought? 2018. [CrossRef]
- Douglas W. Portmore. Philosophical Studies. Maximalism versus omnism about reasons 2017. [CrossRef]
- Adam Bales, Claire Benn. Synthese. Supererogation and sequence 2021. [CrossRef]
- Douglas Portmore. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. Maximalism versus Omnism about Permissibility 2017. [CrossRef]
- Michael J. Zimmerman. The Journal of Ethics. Prospective Possibilism 2017. [CrossRef]
- JOSHUA GERT. Utilitas. Perform a Justified Option 2014. [CrossRef]
- Travis Timmerman. Philosophical Studies. Does scrupulous securitism stand-up to scrutiny? Two problems for moral securitism and how we might fix them 2015. [CrossRef]
- Caj Sixten Strandberg. Dialectica. Towards an Ecumenical Theory of Normative Reasons 2018. [CrossRef]
- Shyam Nair. Philosophical Studies. Conflicting reasons, unconflicting ‘ought’s 2016. [CrossRef]