PDC Homepage

Home » Products » Citations

The Journal of Philosophy

Volume 109, Issue 8/9, August/September 2012

Aspects of Explanation, Theory, and Uncertianty

Kenneth F. Schaffner
Pages 534-565
DOI: 10.5840/jphil20121098/926

Ernest Nagel and Reduction

Cited by

  • Raphael van Riel. The Concept of Reduction 2014: 83. [CrossRef]
  • Tobias Hansson Wahlberg. Synthese. Why the social sciences are irreducible 2017. [CrossRef]
  • Olimpia LOMBARDI, Juan Camilo MARTÍNEZ GONZÁLEZ. ArtefaCToS. Revista de estudios sobre la ciencia y la tecnología. El problema de la irreversibilidad: una relación interteórica de dos niveles 2018. [CrossRef]
  • Sahotra Sarkar. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. Nagel on reduction11For discussions, in some cases over many decades, thanks are due to Jordi Cat, Alan Love, Ken Schaffner, Abner Shimony, John Stachel, and Bill Wimsatt. Comments by participants of the Formal Epistemology and the Legacy of Logical Empiricism Workshop (University of Texas, Austin, Spring 2013) and the audience at a Philosophy Department seminar at the University of Sydney were also useful. For comments on previous drafts, thanks are due to Justin Garson and Thomas Uebel. 2015. [CrossRef]
  • Marko Tešić. Synthese. Confirmation and the generalized Nagel–Schaffner model of reduction: a Bayesian analysis 2019. [CrossRef]
  • Kelvin J. McQueen. Synthese. Mass additivity and a priori entailment 2015. [CrossRef]
  • Joshua Rosaler. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. Reduction as an a posteriori Relation 2019. [CrossRef]
  • Olimpia Lombardi, María J. Ferreira Ruiz. Foundations of Science. Distinguishing Between Inter-domain and Intra-domain Emergence 2019. [CrossRef]
There may be additional citations on Google Scholar.