PDC Homepage

Home » Products » Citations

The Journal of Philosophy

Volume 109, Issue 11, November 2012

Michael Strevens
Pages 652-675
DOI: 10.5840/jphil20121091138

Ceteris Paribus Hedges: Causal Voodoo that Works

Cited by

  • Alexander Reutlinger. Erkenntnis. Do Statistical Laws Solve the ‘Problem of Provisos’? 2014. [CrossRef]
  • Ann Whittle. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Ceteris Paribus, I Could Have Done Otherwise 2016. [CrossRef]
  • Alexander Reutlinger, Matthias Unterhuber. Erkenntnis. Thinking about Non-Universal Laws 2014. [CrossRef]
  • Marco J. Nathan. Noûs. A Simulacrum Account of Dispositional Properties 2015. [CrossRef]
  • Michael Strevens. Erkenntnis. High-Level Exceptions Explained 2014. [CrossRef]
  • Alexander Reutlinger. Explanation in the Special Sciences 2014: 131. [CrossRef]
  • Kai-Yuan Cheng. Philosophy of Science in Practice 2017: 87. [CrossRef]
  • Jennifer S. Jhun. Philosophy of Science. What’s the Point of Ceteris Paribus? or, How to Understand Supply and Demand Curves 2018. [CrossRef]
  • Robert Kowalenko. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Manipulationism, Ceteris Paribus Laws, and the Bugbear of Background Knowledge 2017. [CrossRef]
  • John T. Roberts. Erkenntnis. CP-Law Statements as Vague, Self-Referential, Self-Locating, Statistical, and Perfectly in Order 2014. [CrossRef]
  • Bernhard Nickel. Erkenntnis. The Role of Kinds in the Semantics of Ceteris Paribus Laws 2014. [CrossRef]
  • Lisa Warenski. Synthese. Epistemic norms: truth conducive enough 2019. [CrossRef]
There may be additional citations on Google Scholar.