PDC Homepage

Home » Products » Citations

The Journal of Philosophy

Volume 102, Issue 7, July 2005

Joseph LaPorte
Pages 357-374
DOI: 10.5840/jphil2005102717

Is There a Single Objective, Evolutionary Tree of Life?

Cited by

  • Joel D. Velasco. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. Species concepts should not conflict with evolutionary history, but often do 2008. [CrossRef]
  • Matt H. Haber, Jay Odenbaugh. Biological Theory. The Edges and Boundaries of Biological Objects 2009. [CrossRef]
  • Yann Bertrand, Mikael Härlin. Zoologica Scripta. Phylogenetic hypotheses, taxonomic sameness and the reference of taxon names 2008. [CrossRef]
  • Marion Godman. Synthese. Scientific realism with historical essences: the case of species 2018. [CrossRef]
  • Andrew Hamilton, Matthew H. Haber. Biological Theory. Clades Are Reproducers 2006. [CrossRef]
  • Matthew Mosdell. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. When to think like an epistemicist 2015. [CrossRef]
  • Joseph LaPorte. Biological Theory. On Systematists’ Single Objective Tree of Ancestors and Descendants 2009. [CrossRef]
  • Joseph LaPorte. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. In defense of species 2007. [CrossRef]
  • Joel D. Velasco. Biology & Philosophy. When monophyly is not enough: exclusivity as the key to defining a phylogenetic species concept 2009. [CrossRef]
  • J. D. Velasco. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. Species, Genes, and the Tree of Life 2010. [CrossRef]
  • Marc Ereshefsky. Synthese. Darwin’s solution to the species problem 2010. [CrossRef]
There may be additional citations on Google Scholar.