The Journal of Philosophy

Volume 89, Issue 5, May 1992

Haim Gaifman
Pages 223-261

Pointers to Truth

Cited by

  • Michael Glanzberg. Journal of Philosophical Logic. A Contextual-Hierarchical Approach to Truth and the Liar Paradox 2004. [CrossRef]
  • Cantini Andrea. Logic from Russell to Church 2009: 875. [CrossRef]
  • Lorenzo Rossi. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. Bicontextualism 2023. [CrossRef]
  • Sujata Ghosh, Benedikt Löwe, Erik Scorelle. Conceptual Structures: Knowledge Architectures for Smart Applications 2007: 401. [CrossRef]
  • Stefan Wintein. Minds and Machines. On the Behavior of True and False 2012. [CrossRef]
  • Sujata Ghosh*, Fernando R. Velázquez-Quesada**. Games, Norms and Reasons 2011: 77. [CrossRef]
  • Haim Gaifman. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic. Self-reference and the acyclicity of rational choice 1999. [CrossRef]
  • Anil Gupta, Shawn Standefer. Journal of Philosophical Logic. Conditionals in Theories of Truth 2017. [CrossRef]
  • Byeong-Uk Yi. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. Descending Chains and the Contextualist Approach to Semantic Paradoxes 1999. [CrossRef]
  • JAMES R. SHAW. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Truth, Paradox, and Ineffable Propositions* 2013. [CrossRef]
  • Roy T. Cook. Journal of Symbolic Logic. Patterns of paradox 2004. [CrossRef]
  • Juan Barba. Linguistics and Philosophy. Formal semantics in the age of pragmatics 2007. [CrossRef]
  • Jay Newhard. Philosophical Studies. The Chrysippus intuition and contextual theories of truth 2009. [CrossRef]
  • Robert C. Koons. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. Book Review: Scott Soames. Understanding Truth 2000. [CrossRef]
  • Keith Simmons. Philosophical Studies. Paradoxes of denotation 1994. [CrossRef]
  • Michał Walicki. Synthese. Reference, paradoxes and truth 2009. [CrossRef]
  • Sujata Ghosh, Fernando R. Velázquez-Quesada. Logic, Language, and Computation 2009: 124. [CrossRef]
  • Albert Visser. Handbook of Philosophical Logic 2002: 149. [CrossRef]
  • C. Dutilh Novaes. History and Philosophy of Logic. A Comparative Taxonomy of Medieval and Modern Approaches to Liar Sentences 2008. [CrossRef]
  • Miroslav Hanke. History and Philosophy of Logic. The Bricot–Mair Dispute: Scholastic Prolegomena to Non-Compositional Semantics 2014. [CrossRef]
  • Bruno Whittle. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. Truth and Generalized Quantification 2019. [CrossRef]
  • Miroslav Hanke. Aither. The "last sophism" of Roger Swyneshed. Remarks on a fourteenth-century insolubilia-treatise 2012. [CrossRef]
  • Benedikt Löwe. Conceptual Structures: Inspiration and Application 2006: 22. [CrossRef]
  • Hartley Slater. Ratio. Tarski's Hidden Assumption 2004. [CrossRef]
  • JC BEALL, MICHAEL GLANZBERG. Midwest Studies In Philosophy. Where the Paths Meet: Remarks on Truth and Paradox* 2008. [CrossRef]
  • Laurence Goldstein. Unity, Truth and the Liar 2008: 65. [CrossRef]
  • Andy Yu. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. ‘True’ as Polysemous 2021. [CrossRef]
  • Jared Warren. Journal of Philosophical Logic. The Liar Paradox and “Meaningless” Revenge 2024. [CrossRef]
  • Leon Horsten. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. A Kripkean Approach to Unknowability and Truth 1998. [CrossRef]
  • JC Beall. Philosophy of Logic 2007: 325. [CrossRef]
  • Kai-Uwe Küdhnberger, Benedikt Löwe, Michael Möllerfeld, Philip Welch. Studia Logica. Comparing Inductive and Circular Definitions: Parameters, Complexity and Games 2005. [CrossRef]
  • David McElhoes. Philosophical Studies. The intoxicating effects of conciliatory omniscience 2021. [CrossRef]
  • Haim Gaifman. Synthese. Vagueness, tolerance and contextual logic 2010. [CrossRef]
  • Hannes Leitgeb. Journal of Philosophical Logic. What Truth Depends on 2005. [CrossRef]
  • Andrew Bacon. The Philosophical Review. Can the Classical Logician Avoid the Revenge Paradoxes? 2015. [CrossRef]
  • Anil Gupta. The Blackwell Guide to Philosophical Logic 2017: 90. [CrossRef]
  • Sjur Dyrkolbotn, Michał Walicki. Synthese. Propositional discourse logic 2014. [CrossRef]
  • BRUNO WHITTLE. The Review of Symbolic Logic. EXCEPTIONAL LOGIC 2021. [CrossRef]
  • Miroslav Hanke. Res Philosophica. Semantic Paradox: A Comparative Analysis of Scholastic and Analytic Views 2014. [CrossRef]
  • Eric Gordon Epstein. The Philosophical Review. Reflections on the Liar 2019. [CrossRef]
  • Catarina Dutilh Novaes. History and Philosophy of Logic. Buridan'sConsequentia: Consequence and Inference Within a Token-Based Semantics 2005. [CrossRef]
  • Alexandre Billon. The Realism-Antirealism Debate in the Age of Alternative Logics 2012: 25. [CrossRef]
  • Andrew Bacon. Philosophical Perspectives. RADICAL ANTI‐DISQUOTATIONALISM 2018. [CrossRef]
  • TIMO BERINGER, THOMAS SCHINDLER. The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic. A GRAPH-THEORETIC ANALYSIS OF THE SEMANTIC PARADOXES 2017. [CrossRef]
  • Michael Glanzberg. Unifying the Philosophy of Truth 2015: 211. [CrossRef]
  • Brian Edison McDonald. Journal of Philosophical Logic. On Meaningfulness and Truth 2000. [CrossRef]
  • Christopher Gauker. Journal of Philosophical Logic. Against Stepping Back: A Critique of Contextualist Approaches to the Semantic Paradoxes 2006. [CrossRef]
  • Gian Aldo Antonelli. Economics and Philosophy. Paradoxes of Belief and Strategic Rationality, Koons Robert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992, xii + 174 pages. 1993. [CrossRef]
  • Keith Simmons. Journal of Philosophical Logic. Deflationary Truth and the Liar 1999. [CrossRef]
  • George Bealer. Journal of Philosophical Logic. Property theory: The type-free approachv. the church approach 1994. [CrossRef]
  • Keith Simmons. A Companion to Philosophical Logic 2006: 115. [CrossRef]
  • James R. Shaw. Inquiry. Magidor on anomaly and truth-value gaps 2016. [CrossRef]
  • LORENZO ROSSI. The Review of Symbolic Logic. A UNIFIED THEORY OF TRUTH AND PARADOX 2019. [CrossRef]
There may be additional citations on Google Scholar.