Faith and Philosophy

Volume 33, Issue 4, September 2016

Joshua Mugg
Pages 441-460

The Quietest Challenge to the Axiology of God
A Cognitive Approach to Counterpossibles

Cited by

  • KIRK LOUGHEED. Dialogue. Anti-Theism and the Objective Meaningful Life Argument 2017. [CrossRef]
  • PHILIPP KREMERS. Religious Studies. What if God commanded something horrible? A pragmatics-based defence of divine command metaethics 2021. [CrossRef]
  • Kirk Lougheed. The Axiological Status of Theism and Other Worldviews 2020: 3. [CrossRef]
  • Mark B. Anderson. The Philosophical Forum. Anti‐theism, the underground man, and escaping absurdity 2022. [CrossRef]
  • Frederick Choo. Religious Studies. Conversational implicatures cannot save divine command theory from the counterpossible terrible commands objection 2023. [CrossRef]
  • Asha Lancaster-Thomas. Religions. Can Heaven Justify Horrendous Moral Evils? A Postmortem Autopsy 2023. [CrossRef]
  • Joshua Mugg. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. Faith Entails Belief: Three Avenues of Defense Against the Argument from Doubt 2022. [CrossRef]
  • Kirk Lougheed. Ratio. The axiological solution to divine hiddenness 2018. [CrossRef]
  • JIMMY ALFONSO LICON. Religious Studies. Aspirational theism and gratuitous suffering 2021. [CrossRef]
  • KIRK LOUGHEED. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review/Revue canadienne de philosophie. On How (Not) to Argue for Preferring God’s Non-Existence 2019. [CrossRef]
  • Brian Scott Ballard. The Philosophical Quarterly. The Threat of Anti-Theism: What is at Stake in the Axiology of God? 2024. [CrossRef]
There may be additional citations on Google Scholar.