Volume 23, Issue 1, 2021
Symposium on Analyzing Doctrine
Joanna Leidenhag
Pages 53-62
Pneumatology, Participation, and Load-Bearing Structures
A Response to Oliver D. Crisp’s Analyzing Doctrine
As Oliver D. Crisp’s Analyzing Doctrine sets out the major moves of a future analytic systematic theology, this response worries about the lack of close attention to work of the Holy Spirit. It is argued that this generates an unhelpful (and unintended) tendency for key theological concepts to collapse into one another. First, the concepts of theosis, participation, union, conformity, and sanctification appear indistinguishable. Second, Crisp portrays monofocal attention to the union of incarnation, without equal concern for that additional complementary way that humanity is united to God, namely, the indwelling of the Holy Spirit.